Literature DB >> 19158364

HapMap methylation-associated SNPs, markers of germline DNA methylation, positively correlate with regional levels of human meiotic recombination.

Martin I Sigurdsson1, Albert V Smith, Hans T Bjornsson, Jon J Jonsson.   

Abstract

Inter-individual and regional variability in recombination rates cannot be fully explained by the DNA sequence itself. Epigenetic mechanisms might be one additional factor affecting recombination. A biochemical approach to studying human germline methylation is difficult. We used the density of the 434,198 nonredundant methylation-associated SNPs (mSNPs) in the derived allele HapMap data set as a surrogate marker for germline DNA methylation. We validated our methodology by demonstrating that the mSNP density confirmed known patterns of genomic methylation, including the hypermutability of methylated cytosine and hypomethylation of CpG islands. Using this approach, we found a genome-wide positive correlation between germline methylation and regional recombination rate (500-kb windows: r = 0.622, P < 10(-15)). This remained significant with multiple correlations correcting for sequence features known to affect recombination, such as GC content and CpG dinucleotides (500-kb windows: r = 0.172, P < 10(-15)). Using the ENCODE data set for increased resolution, we found a positive correlation between germline DNA methylation and recombination rate (50-kb windows: r = 0.301, P = 0.002). This correlation was further strengthened when corrected for sequence features affecting recombination (50-kb windows: r = 0.445, P < 0.0001). In the Human Epigenome Project data set there was increased DNA methylation in regions within recombination hot spots in male germ cells (0.632 vs. 0.557, P = 0.007). The relationship we observed between germline DNA methylation and recombination could be explained in two ways that are not mutually exclusive: DNA methylation could indicate preferred sites for recombination, or methylation following recombination could inhibit further recombination, perhaps by being part of the enigmatic molecular pathway mediating crossover interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19158364      PMCID: PMC2665777          DOI: 10.1101/gr.086181.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  54 in total

1.  Intensely punctate meiotic recombination in the class II region of the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; L Kauppi; R Neumann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  The human genome browser at UCSC.

Authors:  W James Kent; Charles W Sugnet; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Tom H Pringle; Alan M Zahler; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Jesus Sainz; Gudrun M Jonsdottir; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Bjorgvin Richardsson; Sigrun Sigurdardottir; John Barnard; Bjorn Hallbeck; Gisli Masson; Adam Shlien; Stefan T Palsson; Michael L Frigge; Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool.

Authors:  Donna Karolchik; Angela S Hinrichs; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Charles W Sugnet; David Haussler; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome have unusually high recombination rates.

Authors:  Martin J Lercher; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The DNA sequence and biology of human chromosome 19.

Authors:  Jane Grimwood; Laurie A Gordon; Anne Olsen; Astrid Terry; Jeremy Schmutz; Jane Lamerdin; Uffe Hellsten; David Goodstein; Olivier Couronne; Mary Tran-Gyamfi; Andrea Aerts; Michael Altherr; Linda Ashworth; Eva Bajorek; Stacey Black; Elbert Branscomb; Sean Caenepeel; Anthony Carrano; Chenier Caoile; Yee Man Chan; Mari Christensen; Catherine A Cleland; Alex Copeland; Eileen Dalin; Paramvir Dehal; Mirian Denys; John C Detter; Julio Escobar; Dave Flowers; Dea Fotopulos; Carmen Garcia; Anca M Georgescu; Tijana Glavina; Maria Gomez; Eidelyn Gonzales; Matthew Groza; Nancy Hammon; Trevor Hawkins; Lauren Haydu; Isaac Ho; Wayne Huang; Sanjay Israni; Jamie Jett; Kristen Kadner; Heather Kimball; Arthur Kobayashi; Vladimer Larionov; Sun-Hee Leem; Frederick Lopez; Yunian Lou; Steve Lowry; Stephanie Malfatti; Diego Martinez; Paula McCready; Catherine Medina; Jenna Morgan; Kathryn Nelson; Matt Nolan; Ivan Ovcharenko; Sam Pitluck; Martin Pollard; Anthony P Popkie; Paul Predki; Glenda Quan; Lucia Ramirez; Sam Rash; James Retterer; Alex Rodriguez; Stephanine Rogers; Asaf Salamov; Angelica Salazar; Xinwei She; Doug Smith; Tom Slezak; Victor Solovyev; Nina Thayer; Hope Tice; Ming Tsai; Anna Ustaszewska; Nu Vo; Mark Wagner; Jeremy Wheeler; Kevin Wu; Gary Xie; Joan Yang; Inna Dubchak; Terrence S Furey; Pieter DeJong; Mark Dickson; David Gordon; Evan E Eichler; Len A Pennacchio; Paul Richardson; Lisa Stubbs; Daniel S Rokhsar; Richard M Myers; Edward M Rubin; Susan M Lucas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Chromosome instability and immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in a DNA methyltransferase gene.

Authors:  G L Xu; T H Bestor; D Bourc'his; C L Hsieh; N Tommerup; M Bugge; M Hulten; X Qu; J J Russo; E Viegas-Péquignot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.

Authors:  Michael I Jensen-Seaman; Terrence S Furey; Bret A Payseur; Yontao Lu; Krishna M Roskin; Chin-Fu Chen; Michael A Thomas; David Haussler; Howard J Jacob
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  CpG methylation of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical cancer cell lines and in clinical specimens: genomic hypomethylation correlates with carcinogenic progression.

Authors:  Vinay Badal; Linda S H Chuang; Eileen Hwee-Hong Tan; Sushma Badal; Luisa L Villa; Cosette M Wheeler; Benjamin F L Li; Hans-Ulrich Bernard
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Double strand breaks can initiate gene silencing and SIRT1-dependent onset of DNA methylation in an exogenous promoter CpG island.

Authors:  Heather M O'Hagan; Helai P Mohammad; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  32 in total

1.  Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: a strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease.

Authors:  Caroline L Relton; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Extensive recombination rate variation in the house mouse species complex inferred from genetic linkage maps.

Authors:  Beth L Dumont; Michael A White; Brian Steffy; Tim Wiltshire; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Organization and roles of nucleosomes at mouse meiotic recombination hotspots.

Authors:  Irina V Getun; Zhen K Wu; Philippe R J Bois
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.197

4.  High-resolution linkage map for two honeybee chromosomes: the hotspot quest.

Authors:  Florence Mougel; Marie-Anne Poursat; Nicolas Beaume; Dominique Vautrin; Michel Solignac
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  A comprehensive linkage map of the dog genome.

Authors:  Aaron K Wong; Alison L Ruhe; Beth L Dumont; Kathryn R Robertson; Giovanna Guerrero; Sheila M Shull; Janet S Ziegle; Lee V Millon; Karl W Broman; Bret A Payseur; Mark W Neff
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Recombination rate variation in closely related species.

Authors:  C S Smukowski; M A F Noor
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Genomic signatures of germline gene expression.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; Phil Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Intronic AT skew is a defendable proxy for germline transcription but does not predict crossing-over or protein evolution rates in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Claudia C Weber; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  CG methylation.

Authors:  Charles Vinson; Raghunath Chatterjee
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.778

10.  Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me.

Authors:  Luke E Berchowitz; Gregory P Copenhaver
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.