Literature DB >> 19157739

Quantitative contrast enhanced ultrasound of the liver for time intensity curves-Reliability and potential sources of errors.

Andre Ignee1, Maciej Jedrejczyk, Gudrun Schuessler, Wieslaw Jakubowski, Christoph F Dietrich.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Time intensity curves for real-time contrast enhanced low MI ultrasound is a promising technique since it adds objective data to the more subjective conventional contrast enhanced technique. Current developments showed that the amount of uptake in modern targeted therapy strategies correlates with therapy response. Nevertheless no basic research has been done concerning the reliability and validity of the method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Videos sequences of 31 consecutive patients for at least 60s were recorded. Parameters analysed: area under the curve, maximum intensity, mean transit time, perfusion index, time to peak, rise time. The influence of depth, lateral shift as well as size and shape of the region of interest was analysed.
RESULTS: The parameters time to peak and rise time showed a good stability in different depths. Overall there was a variation >50% for all other parameters. Mean transit time, time to peak and rise time were stable from 3 to 10cm depths, whereas all other parameters showed only satisfying results at 4-6cm. Time to peak and rise time were stable as well against lateral shifting whereas all other parameters had again variations over 50%. Size and shape of the region of interest did not influence the results. DISCUSSION: (1) It is important to compare regions of interest, e.g. in a tumour vs. representative parenchyma in the same depths. (2) Time intensity curves should not be analysed in a depth of less than 4cm. (3) The parameters area under the curve, perfusion index and maximum intensity should not be analysed in a depth more than 6cm. (4) Size and shape of a region of interest in liver parenchyma do not affect time intensity curves. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19157739     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Basic principles of ultrasonography and its relevance for internal medicine].

Authors:  J S Bleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: assessment of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Ursula Nemec; Stefan F Nemec; Clemens Novotny; Michael Weber; Christian Czerny; Christian R Krestan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Christian Jenssen; Adrian Saftoiu; Andre Ignee; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Estimation of intra-operator variability in perfusion parameter measurements using DCE-US.

Authors:  Marianne Gauthier; Ingrid Leguerney; Jessie Thalmensi; Mohamed Chebil; Sarah Parisot; Pierre Peronneau; Alain Roche; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-28

5.  Perfusion contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict early lymph-node metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Shunji Mugikura; Minoru Miyashita; Yumiko Kudo; Mikiko Suzuki; Li Li; Yu Mori; Shoki Takahashi; Kei Takase
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an emerging technology in abdominal and pelvic imaging.

Authors:  Marybeth A Pysz; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  High Resolution Ultrasound Superharmonic Perfusion Imaging: In Vivo Feasibility and Quantification of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Acoustic Angiography.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Sarah E Shelton; K Heath Martin; Kathryn A Ozgun; Juan D Rojas; F Stuart Foster; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in HCC: prediction of response to a new combination therapy of sorafenib and panobinostat in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ferdinand Knieling; Maximilian J Waldner; Ruediger S Goertz; Deike Strobel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-12-17

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography parameters in neural network diagnosis of liver tumors.

Authors:  Costin Teodor Streba; Mihaela Ionescu; Dan Ionut Gheonea; Larisa Sandulescu; Tudorel Ciurea; Adrian Saftoiu; Cristin Constantin Vere; Ion Rogoveanu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Conventional frequency ultrasonic biomarkers of cancer treatment response in vivo.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Omar Falou; Hadi Tadayyon; Azza Al-Mahrouki; William Tran; Naum Papanicolau; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.