Literature DB >> 19156431

Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer.

Cun Wang1, Zong-guang Zhou, Yong-yang Yu, Ye Shu, Yuan Li, Lie Yang, Li Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Total mesorectal excision (TME) was advocated owning to the reduction in local failure, while deficiency in pathologic details limited monitoring of surgical quality assurance. Here, we aimed to examine circumferential resection margin (CRM) by large tissue slice, discussing its rule in occurrence and relationship with prognosis, thus providing proof for the adoption of TME principles and the application of adjuvant therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens of 106 patients with rectal cancer, who underwent potentially curative resection from December 2001 to September 2002, were examined. Follow-up data were collected.
RESULTS: Altogether, 2,068 mesorectal nodes were examined with 272 involved by tumor. CRM involvement (CRMI) was examined in 20 specimens. In these 20 cases, seven, nine, and four were caused by tumor infiltration, lymph node metastasis, and both, respectively. Occurrence of CRMI was more common for lower-located cancers while also statistically related to tumor differentiation, infiltration, and lymph node metastasis. The difference in local recurrence rate, general recurrence rate, disease-free survival rate, and overall survival rate between the group with CRMI and the group without were all proven to be significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Detailed pathologic examination, including status of CRM, is advocated since it provides accurate prognostic information. Surgeons could maximize the probability of cure by following the principle of TME. Preoperative adjuvant therapy was essential for advanced staged and lower-located lesions, which implied likelihood of CRMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19156431     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0624-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Wibe; P R Rendedal; E Svensson; J Norstein; T J Eide; H E Myrvold; O Søreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer.

Authors:  P P Tekkis; A G Heriot; J Smith; M R Thompson; P Finan; J D Stamatakis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Arbman; E Nilsson; O Hallböök; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination.

Authors:  P Quirke; M F Dixon
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Surgical adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  Dulabh K Monga; Michael J O'Connell
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report.

Authors:  L Stocchi; H Nelson; D J Sargent; M J O'Connell; J E Tepper; J E Krook; R Beart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language.

Authors:  R Glynne-Jones; S Mawdsley; J R Novell
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; R Severino; M B Honnebier; P Tom; T S Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Complete mesocolic excision--a marker of surgical quality?

Authors:  Aisling M Hogan; Des C Winter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhen-Xu Zhou; Li-Ying Zhao; Tian Lin; Hao Liu; Hai-Jun Deng; Heng-Liang Zhu; Jun Yan; Guo-Xin Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Clinical characteristics of rectal cancer involving the anal canal.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Ota; Shoichi Fujii; Yasushi Ichikawa; Hirokazu Suwa; Kenji Tatsumi; Kazuteru Watanabe; Kuniya Tanaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk factors of circumferential resection margin involvement in the patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sung Jin Oh; Jin Yong Shin
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-02-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.