Literature DB >> 19156239

Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.

Brian A Bruckner1, Leon P Jacob, Igor D Gregoric, Pranav Loyalka, Biswajit Kar, William E Cohn, Saverio La Francesca, Branislav Radovancevic, O H Frazier.   

Abstract

Cardiac support with a ventricular assist device is among the few treatments for heart-failure patients who have profound cardiogenic shock unresponsive to vasopressors and intra-aortic balloon pumps. The TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device can provide temporary support until another device can be placed or a donor heart becomes available. We examined the TandemHeart's effect on cardiac index, central venous pressure, mixed venous oxygen saturation, creatinine, mean arterial pressure, urine output, and 30-day mortality rate in 5 heart-failure patients (2 with nonischemic and 3 with ischemic cardiomyopathy; mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.17 +/- 0.056). Two patients were undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation when the device was inserted. The average duration of TandemHeart support was 7.6 +/- 3.2 days; all patients were successfully bridged to transplantation. The TandemHeart improved the cardiac index (1.9 +/- 0.3 vs 3.5 +/- 0.8 L/[min.m2], P= 0.01), mean arterial pressure (69 +/- 12.5 vs 91 +/- 4.3 mmHg, P=0.009), mixed venous oxygen saturation (45.4 +/- 14.3 vs 71.4 +/- 7.5, P=0.009), and urine output (1,861 +/- 988 vs 4,314 +/- 1,346 mL/hr, P=0.01). The device decreased central venous pressure (21.2 +/- 7.4 vs 12.8 +/- 5.9 mmHg, P=0.02) and pressor requirements (2.4 +/- 1.1 vs 1.0 +/- 0.7 agents, P=0.02). Average long-term follow-up after heart transplantation was 8.4 +/- 9.9 months, with no deaths. We conclude that the TandemHeart can provide hemodynamic support for patients with profound, refractory cardiogenic shock. Furthermore, the device can bridge patients to cardiac transplantation and can be placed percutaneously, without invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted circulation/instrumentation/methods; blood vessel prosthesis implantation; cardiac output; cardiomyopathies/complications/mortality/therapy; equipment design; heart failure/complications/therapy; heart-assist devices; hemodynamics; preoperative care; shock, cardiogenic/mortality/physiopathology/therapy; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19156239      PMCID: PMC2607106     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  20 in total

1.  Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Biswajit Kar; Lindsay E Adkins; Andrew B Civitello; Pranav Loyalka; Nanthini Palanichamy; Courtney J Gemmato; Timothy J Myers; Igor D Gregoric; Reynolds M Delgado
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

2.  Mechanical circulatory support therapy as a bridge to transplant or recovery (new advances).

Authors:  James K Kirklin; William L Holman
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Anvar Babaev; Paul D Frederick; David J Pasta; Nathan Every; Tina Sichrovsky; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial.

Authors:  S Scheidt; G Wilner; H Mueller; D Summers; M Lesch; G Wolff; J Krakauer; M Rubenfire; P Fleming; G Noon; N Oldham; T Killip; A Kantrowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Mechanical circulatory support for acute heart failure.

Authors:  D G Pennington; N G Smedira; L E Samuels; M A Acker; J J Curtis; F D Pagani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Hemodynamic support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device during stenting of an unprotected left main coronary artery.

Authors:  Biswajit Kar; Alexander Butkevich; Andrew B Civitello; Mohamad A Nawar; Brian Walton; Gregory N Messner; Igor D Gregoric; James Feldman; Timothy J Myers; Courtney Gemmato; Reynolds M Delgado
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004

8.  The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge).

Authors:  Igor D Gregoric; Leon P Jacob; Saverio La Francesca; Brian A Bruckner; William E Cohn; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

9.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in decompensated cardiomyopathy patients: bridge to transplantation or assist device.

Authors:  Ieva Norkiene; Donata Ringaitiene; Kestutis Rucinskas; Robertas Samalavicius; Alis Baublys; Saulius Miniauskas; Vytautas Sirvydis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-11-21

10.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation as a 'bridge' to cardiac transplantation. Effects in nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  A M Rosenbaum; S Murali; B F Uretsky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Surgical implant techniques of left ventricular assist devices: an overview of acute and durable devices.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Treatment strategies for patients with an INTERMACS I profile.

Authors:  Walid K Abu Saleh; Odeaa Al Jabbari; Ashrith Guha; Matthias Loebe; Brian A Bruckner
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditya Mandawat; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 5.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  The Surgeon's Role in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Alexandra E Sperry; Matthew Williams; Pavan Atluri; Wilson Y Szeto; Marisa Cevasco; Christian A Bermudez; Michael A Acker; Michael Ibrahim
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 7.  Nephrology Considerations in the Management of Durable and Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Carl P Walther; Andrew B Civitello; Kenneth K Liao; Sankar D Navaneethan
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 8.  Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Available Modalities and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Mohammed Faluk; Syed Mustajab Hasan; Tianyu Jiang; Ramy Abdelmaseih; Jigar Patel
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2021-01-14

9.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?

Authors:  Diego Arroyo; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-07-31

Review 10.  Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nisha A Gilotra; Gerin R Stevens
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.