CONTEXT: Limited information exists regarding the role of left ventricular function in predicting exercise capacity and impact on age- and sex-related differences. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of measures of cardiac function assessed by echocardiography on exercise capacity and to determine if these associations are modified by sex or advancing age. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of patients undergoing exercise echocardiography with routine measurements of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by 2-dimensional and Doppler techniques. Analyses were conducted to determine the strongest correlates of exercise capacity and the age and sex interactions of these variables with exercise capacity. SETTING: Large tertiary referral center in Rochester, Minnesota, in 2006. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing exercise echocardiography using the Bruce protocol (N = 2867). Patients with echocardiographic evidence of exercise-induced ischemia, ejection fractions lower than 50%, or significant valvular heart disease were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Exercise capacity in metabolic equivalents (METs). RESULTS: Diastolic dysfunction was strongly and inversely associated with exercise capacity. Compared with normal function, after multivariate adjustment, those with moderate/severe resting diastolic dysfunction (-1.30 METs; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.52 to -0.99; P < .001) and mild resting diastolic dysfunction (-0.70 METs; 95% CI, -0.88 to -0.46; P < .001) had substantially lower exercise capacity. Variation of left ventricular systolic function within the normal range was not associated with exercise capacity. Left ventricular filling pressures measured by resting E/e' of 15 or greater (-0.41 METs; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.11; P = .007) or postexercise E/e' of 15 or greater (-0.41 METs; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.11; P = .007) were similarly associated with a reduction in exercise capacity, each in separate multivariate analyses. Individuals with impaired relaxation (mild dysfunction) or resting E/e' of 15 or greater had a progressive increase in the magnitude of reduction in exercise capacity with advancing age (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively). Other independent correlates of exercise capacity were age (unstandardized beta coefficient, -0.85 METs; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.77, per 10-year increment; P < .001), female sex (-1.98 METs; 95% CI, -2.15 to -1.84; P < .001), and body mass index greater than 30 (-1.24 METs; 95% CI, -1.41 to -1.10; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this large cross-sectional study of those referred for exercise echocardiography and not limited by ischemia, abnormalities of left ventricular diastolic function were independently associated with exercise capacity.
CONTEXT: Limited information exists regarding the role of left ventricular function in predicting exercise capacity and impact on age- and sex-related differences. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of measures of cardiac function assessed by echocardiography on exercise capacity and to determine if these associations are modified by sex or advancing age. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of patients undergoing exercise echocardiography with routine measurements of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by 2-dimensional and Doppler techniques. Analyses were conducted to determine the strongest correlates of exercise capacity and the age and sex interactions of these variables with exercise capacity. SETTING: Large tertiary referral center in Rochester, Minnesota, in 2006. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing exercise echocardiography using the Bruce protocol (N = 2867). Patients with echocardiographic evidence of exercise-induced ischemia, ejection fractions lower than 50%, or significant valvular heart disease were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Exercise capacity in metabolic equivalents (METs). RESULTS:Diastolic dysfunction was strongly and inversely associated with exercise capacity. Compared with normal function, after multivariate adjustment, those with moderate/severe resting diastolic dysfunction (-1.30 METs; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.52 to -0.99; P < .001) and mild resting diastolic dysfunction (-0.70 METs; 95% CI, -0.88 to -0.46; P < .001) had substantially lower exercise capacity. Variation of left ventricular systolic function within the normal range was not associated with exercise capacity. Left ventricular filling pressures measured by resting E/e' of 15 or greater (-0.41 METs; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.11; P = .007) or postexercise E/e' of 15 or greater (-0.41 METs; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.11; P = .007) were similarly associated with a reduction in exercise capacity, each in separate multivariate analyses. Individuals with impaired relaxation (mild dysfunction) or resting E/e' of 15 or greater had a progressive increase in the magnitude of reduction in exercise capacity with advancing age (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively). Other independent correlates of exercise capacity were age (unstandardized beta coefficient, -0.85 METs; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.77, per 10-year increment; P < .001), female sex (-1.98 METs; 95% CI, -2.15 to -1.84; P < .001), and body mass index greater than 30 (-1.24 METs; 95% CI, -1.41 to -1.10; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this large cross-sectional study of those referred for exercise echocardiography and not limited by ischemia, abnormalities of left ventricular diastolic function were independently associated with exercise capacity.
Authors: S R Ommen; R A Nishimura; C P Appleton; F A Miller; J K Oh; M M Redfield; A J Tajik Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jong Won Ha; Fabijan Lulic; Kent R Bailey; Patricia A Pellikka; James B Seward; A Jamil Tajik; Jae K Oh Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gregory Gilman; Tishri A Nelson; William H Hansen; Bijoy K Khandheria; Steve R Ommen Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Jonathan Myers; Manish Prakash; Victor Froelicher; Dat Do; Sara Partington; J Edwin Atwood Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul L Enright; Mary Ann McBurnie; Vera Bittner; Russell P Tracy; Robert McNamara; Alice Arnold; Anne B Newman Journal: Chest Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Steven J Jacobsen; John C Burnett; Douglas W Mahoney; Kent R Bailey; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Keith P George; Louise H Naylor; Greg P Whyte; Rob E Shave; David Oxborough; Daniel J Green Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Stephanie K Brinker; Ambarish Pandey; Colby R Ayers; Carolyn E Barlow; Laura F DeFina; Benjamin L Willis; Nina B Radford; Ramin Farzaneh-Far; James A de Lemos; Mark H Drazner; Jarett D Berry Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: S Michael Gharacholou; Christopher G Scott; Paul Y Takahashi; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Robert B McCully; Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-04-20 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Niek H Prakken; Maarten J Cramer; Marlon A Olimulder; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Willem P Mali; Birgitta K Velthuis Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 2.357