Literature DB >> 19155394

Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: state-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates.

Jacqueline W Miller1, Jessica B King, A Blythe Ryerson, Christie R Eheman, Mary C White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although breast cancer incidence and mortality rates have declined, a significant number of women are affected by this disease each year. Mammography is currently the most effective way to detect breast cancer at an early stage when it is most treatable, but there have been reports of decreasing or stagnant mammography use in the United States. For this study, we investigated the trend in mammography use for each state in comparison with the corresponding breast cancer incidence trend.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006 to assess the percentage of women >or= 40 years old who reported undergoing mammography within the past 2 years and data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to assess breast cancer incidence rates from 2000 through 2004, the latest year for which data were available at the time of the study.
RESULTS: The majority of states had a decreasing tendency in mammography use from 2000 to 2006. Only one state had a statistically significant increase in reported mammography use, whereas two states had significant decreases. There was a correlation between breast cancer incidence rates and mammography use by states (r = 0.6), but no correlation between the time trends in breast cancer incidence rates and mammography use was observed.
CONCLUSION: There was little statistically significant change in self-reported mammography use from 2000 to 2006. Continued monitoring of breast cancer screening practices and breast cancer incidence trends is important for targeting at-risk populations with effective interventions to improve breast cancer prevention and early detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19155394     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.08.1757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

1.  Characteristics of US counties with no mammography capacity.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Jacqueline Miller; Thomas B Richards; Janet Kay Bobo; Ta Liu; Mary C White; Djenaba Joseph; Florence Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-12

2.  A comparison of breast and cervical cancer legislation and screening in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

Authors:  Stephanie Miles-Richardson; Daniel Blumenthal; Ernest Alema-Mensah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

3.  Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Hua Li; Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Conor B Clancy; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  It's the amount of thought that counts: when ambivalence contributes to mammography screening delay.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer M Gierisch; Barbara K Rimer; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-11-03

5.  Mammography capacity and appointment wait times: barriers to breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Jacqueline G Snow; Nicole M Leoce; Coral L Atoria; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Kaila McDonald; Recinda Sherman; Anita Y Kinney; Antoinette M Stroup
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Geographic access and the use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Nicole M Ishill; Jacqueline G Snow; Katherine S Panageas; Peter B Bach; Laura Liberman; Fahui Wang; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Multilevel Regression for Small-Area Estimation of Mammography Use in the United States, 2014.

Authors:  Zahava Berkowitz; Xingyou Zhang; Thomas B Richards; Susan A Sabatino; Lucy A Peipins; James Holt; Mary C White
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Mammography use among women ages 40-49 after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Lauren D Block; Marian P Jarlenski; Albert W Wu; Wendy L Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The National Prevention Strategy and breast cancer screening: scientific evidence for public health action.

Authors:  Marcus Plescia; Mary C White
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.