Literature DB >> 19155390

Predictors of radiologists' perceived risk of malpractice lawsuits in breast imaging.

John F Dick1, Thomas H Gallagher, R James Brenner, Joyce P Yi, Lisa M Reisch, Linn Abraham, Diana L Miglioretti, Patricia A Carney, Gary R Cutter, Joann G Elmore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The shortage of radiologists in breast imaging may be related to heightened malpractice lawsuit concerns. Our objective was to examine radiologists' reported experiences and perceptions of future lawsuit risk and explore personal and professional factors that may be associated with elevated perceptions of risk.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists who routinely interpret mammography examinations in diverse regions of the United States (Washington, Colorado, and New Hampshire) completed a mailed survey in 2002 and 2006, including questions on demographics, practice characteristics, and medicolegal experience and perceptions as well as a validated scale measuring reactions to uncertainty in clinical situations. A survey assessing the radiologists' work facilities was also completed in 2002.
RESULTS: Participation by eligible radiologists was 77% (139 of 181) in 2002 and 71% (84 of 118) in 2006. The percentage of radiologists reporting malpractice claims related to mammography in the previous 5 years was 8% on the 2002 survey and 10% on the 2006 survey. Radiologists' mean estimate of the probability of being sued for malpractice in the next 5 years (41% in 2002 and 35% in 2006) was markedly higher than the actual reported risk. Radiologists' age, sex, clinical experience, and workload were not associated with a higher perceived risk of being sued. Radiologists who reported higher perceived risk of lawsuits were more likely to have experienced a prior malpractice claim, to report knowing colleagues with prior lawsuits, and to score higher on a scale measuring anxiety caused by uncertainty in clinical situations. Radiologists working at facilities that did not use double reading reported higher perceived risk, but the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Radiologists working in breast imaging substantially overestimate their risk of a future malpractice lawsuit. Radiologists with higher risk perceptions show more negative reactions to uncertainty in a clinical setting. Understanding that their actual risk of malpractice lawsuits may be substantially lower than anticipated may help reduce radiologists' fears and alleviate the manpower shortage in mammography. Programs to address the shortage of breast imagers could be targeted toward radiologists with heightened malpractice lawsuit concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19155390      PMCID: PMC3138733          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

1.  Physicians' perceptions of the risk of being sued.

Authors:  A G Lawthers; A R Localio; N M Laird; S Lipsitz; L Hebert; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 2.  Doctors' responses to medical errors.

Authors:  Michael Rowe
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Authors:  William E Barlow; Chen Chi; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Carl D'Orsi; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter; Eric A Berns; Connie Nakano; Joseph Egger; Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; Carl J D'Orsi; William Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Malpractice litigation fear and risk management beliefs among teaching hospital physicians.

Authors:  J E Schumacher; F J Ritchey; L J Nelson; S Murray; J Martin
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation.

Authors:  T A Brennan; C M Sox; H R Burstin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.

Authors:  R Ballard-Barbash; S H Taplin; B C Yankaskas; V L Ernster; R D Rosenberg; P A Carney; W E Barlow; B M Geller; K Kerlikowske; B K Edwards; C F Lynch; N Urban; C A Chrvala; C R Key; S P Poplack; J K Worden; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium.

Authors:  W Burke; M Daly; J Garber; J Botkin; M J Kahn; P Lynch; A McTiernan; K Offit; J Perlman; G Petersen; E Thomson; C Varricchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Mammography and malpractice litigation: current status, lessons, and admonitions.

Authors:  R J Brenner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  The relationship between physicians' malpractice claims history and later claims. Does the past predict the future?

Authors:  R R Bovbjerg; K R Petronis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-11-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Berta Geller; Natalia Vukshich Oster; Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Edward A Sickles; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Stepping out further from the shadows: disclosure of harmful radiologic errors to patients.

Authors:  Stephen D Brown; Constance D Lehman; Robert D Truog; David M Browning; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Disclosure of adverse events and errors in surgical care: challenges and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Lauren E Lipira; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Usefulness of presentation of similar images in the diagnosis of breast masses on mammograms: comparison of observer performances in Japan and the USA.

Authors:  Chisako Muramatsu; Robert A Schmidt; Junji Shiraishi; Tokiko Endo; Hiroshi Fujita; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-08-08

5.  Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Feasibility and satisfaction with a tailored web-based audit intervention for recalibrating radiologists' thresholds for conducting additional work-up.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Berta M Geller; Edward A Sickles; Diana L Miglioretti; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Linn Abraham; Stephen A Feig; David Brown; Andrea J Cook; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population.

Authors:  Margaret L Crivello; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Kathryn Evers; Yu-Ning Wong; Marcia Boraas; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Disclosing harmful mammography errors to patients.

Authors:  Thomas H Gallagher; Andrea J Cook; R James Brenner; Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy L Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  What Causes the Most Stress in Breast Radiology Practice? A Survey of Members of the Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Jay R Parikh; Jia Sun; Martha B Mainiero
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-04-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.