Literature DB >> 1464708

Physicians' perceptions of the risk of being sued.

A G Lawthers1, A R Localio, N M Laird, S Lipsitz, L Hebert, T A Brennan.   

Abstract

We explore the deterrent effect of the tort system by assessing physician perceptions of the risk of being sued and the impact of those perceptions on their own practice. The data are from a mailed survey conducted in 1989 of a random sample of physicians who were practicing in New York State in 1984. The survey results were compared to the actual risk of suit using the between-group (Wald) test and logistic regression methods. We also surveyed physicians about practice changes undertaken in the last ten years, factors influencing practice standards, and the costs of being sued and included these in the analysis. On average, physicians estimate that 19.5 out of one hundred of their colleagues will be sued in a given year, approximately three times the actual rate, with significant differences by specialty, location, and suit history. Perceived risk is associated with self-reported changes in test-ordering frequency and reduction in practice scope. The median number of days lost from practice to defend a malpractice suit was three to five, and 6 percent of the physicians surveyed incurred some out-of-pocket expenses. These findings suggest that physicians respond to the messages sent by litigation in a manner consistent with the deterrent theory of tort litigation.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1464708     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-17-3-463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  17 in total

Review 1.  Act first and look up the law afterward?: medical malpractice and the ethics of defensive medicine.

Authors:  K De Ville
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-12

2.  Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims.

Authors:  Beth Huntington; Nettie Kuhn
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-04

3.  Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Linn A Abraham; Jessica S Fosse; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  "Health courts" and accountability for patient safety.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; David M Studdert; Allen B Kachalia; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Engaging Law Enforcement in Overdose Reversal Initiatives: Authorization and Liability for Naloxone Administration.

Authors:  Corey S Davis; Derek Carr; Jessica K Southwell; Leo Beletsky
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Christopher W Baugh; Erik P Hess; Joshua A Hilton; Jesse M Pines; Brent R Asplin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Medical malpractice reform: the current proposals.

Authors:  T A Brennan; M Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Futile medical treatment: a review of the ethical arguments and legal holdings.

Authors:  M B Kapp
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  'What does the law say?' Law, ethics, and medical decision making.

Authors:  K De Ville
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-05

10.  On average, physicians spend nearly 11 percent of their 40-year careers with an open, unresolved malpractice claim.

Authors:  Seth A Seabury; Amitabh Chandra; Darius N Lakdawalla; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.