Literature DB >> 19155380

Developing a clinical decision model: MR spectroscopy to differentiate between recurrent tumor and radiation change in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions.

Ethan A Smith1, Ruth C Carlos, Larry R Junck, Christina I Tsien, Augusto Elias, Pia C Sundgren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Differentiation between recurrent neoplasm and postradiation change in patients previously treated for primary brain tumors is often difficult based on imaging features alone. The purpose of this study was to develop a method using alterations in the ratios of standard brain metabolites-choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), and N-acetylaspartate (NAA)-to predict the probability of tumor recurrence in patients previously treated for brain tumors with new contrast-enhancing lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients who had undergone treatment for primary brain tumors in whom routine MRI showed new contrast-enhancing lesions were retrospectively studied. The final diagnosis was assigned using histopathology (n = 13) or imaging follow-up (n = 20; range, 2-27 months). Ratios of three metabolites (Cho, Cr, and NAA) were calculated, and the results were correlated with the final diagnosis using a Wilcoxon's rank sum analysis. A logistic regression model was then used to create a prediction model based on the most statistically significant ratio.
RESULTS: Elevations of the metabolic ratios Cho/Cr (p < 0.001) and Cho/NAA (p < 0.001) and a decrease in the ratio NAA/Cr (p = 0.018) were found in patients with recurrent tumor (n = 20) versus those with postradiation change (n = 13). A prediction model using the Cho/NAA ratio yielded a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 69.2%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92.
CONCLUSION: An elevated Cho/NAA ratio correlated with evidence of tumor recurrence and allowed creation of a prediction rule to aid in lesion classification. The results suggest that MR spectroscopy is a useful tool in assigning patients with nonspecific enhancing lesions to either invasive biopsy or conservative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19155380     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  34 in total

Review 1.  Treatment induced necrosis versus recurrent/progressing brain tumor: going beyond the boundaries of conventional morphologic imaging.

Authors:  Rajan Jain; Jayant Narang; Pia M Sundgren; David Hearshen; Sona Saksena; Jack P Rock; Jorge Gutierrez; Tom Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Comparison of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in Differentiating Recurrent Brain Neoplasm From Radiation Necrosis.

Authors:  William R Masch; Page I Wang; Thomas L Chenevert; Larry Junck; Christina Tsien; Jason A Heth; Pia C Sundgren
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme versus radiation injury: a multiparametric 3-T MR approach.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Teresa Popolizio; Simona Bonavita; Mario de Cristofaro; Renata Conforti; Adriana Cristofano; Claudio Colonnese; Ugo Salvolini; Gioacchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  3-Dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3 Tesla for early response assessment of glioblastoma patients during external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Manickam Muruganandham; Patrick P Clerkin; Brian J Smith; Carryn M Anderson; Ann Morris; Aristides A Capizzano; Vincent Magnotta; Sarah M McGuire; Mark C Smith; John E Bayouth; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Re-defining response and treatment effects for neuro-oncology immunotherapy clinical trials.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Hideho Okada
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Late effects of cancer treatment: consequences for long-term brain cancer survivors.

Authors:  Montse Alemany; Roser Velasco; Marta Simó; Jordi Bruna
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-07-16

Review 7.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Current concepts and challenges in the radiologic assessment of brain tumors in children: part 2.

Authors:  Benita Tamrazi; Kshitij Mankad; Marvin Nelson; Felice D'Arco
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-09-13

Review 9.  Differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment necrosis: a review of neuro-oncologic imaging strategies.

Authors:  Nishant Verma; Matthew C Cowperthwaite; Mark G Burnett; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Apparent diffusion coefficient changes predict survival after intra-arterial bevacizumab treatment in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Naveen Galla; Gloria Chiang; Shamik Chakraborty; Ranjodh Singh; A John Tsiouris; John Boockvar; Ilhami Kovanlikaya
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.