Literature DB >> 19154477

Screening by lower urinary tract symptoms vs asymptomatic prostate-specific antigen levels leading to radical prostatectomy in Danish men: tumour characteristics and treatment outcome.

Michael Borre1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the tumour characteristics and treatment outcome in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer diagnosed with or with no lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Denmark, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is recommended only in men with a family history of prostate cancer, or those with LUTS that could be caused by prostate cancer. However, increasingly many men undergoing RP are asymptomatic and are diagnosed as a result of unsystematic PSA screening. Data were collected prospectively from The Aarhus PC-project, comprising 585 consecutive Danish men treated with RP between 1997 and 2008 at Aarhus University Hospital; of these, 47 had a family history of prostate cancer and were therefore excluded.
RESULTS: In all, 188 (35%) patients stated being asymptomatic at the diagnosis of cancer, while LUTS led to the diagnosis in 350 (65%). Except for tumour grade after RP there were no significant differences between these subpopulations in tumour characteristics and treatment outcome. Unexpectedly, the Gleason score of the RP specimen was a statistically significant prognostic indicator (P = 0.002) in favour of symptomatic patients.
CONCLUSION: This study showed no association between LUTS and tumour characteristics or treatment outcome between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing RP. The Gleason score at RP and thereby the long-term prognosis in asymptomatic patients seems to be worse than in patients with LUTS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19154477     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08306.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Guideline for referral of patients with suspected prostate cancer by family physicians and other primary care providers.

Authors:  Sheila-Mae Young; Praveen Bansal; Emily T Vella; Antonio Finelli; Cheryl Levitt; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Systematic review of clinical features of suspected prostate cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Sheila-Mae Young; Praveen Bansal; Emily T Vella; Antonio Finelli; Cheryl Levitt; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Baseline prostate-specific antigen measurements and subsequent prostate cancer risk in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort.

Authors:  Signe Benzon Larsen; Klaus Brasso; Peter Iversen; Jane Christensen; Michael Christiansen; Sigrid Carlsson; Hans Lilja; Søren Friis; Anne Tjønneland; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Are men who undergo radical prostatectomy with lower urinary tract symptoms at an increased risk for aggressive prostate cancer?

Authors:  Dae Hun Lee; Seung Hwan Lee; Dong Hoon Lee; Mun Su Chung; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-12-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.