Literature DB >> 19154475

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels.

Nathan Lawrentschuk1, Neil Fleshner.   

Abstract

In the past 20 years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has developed rapidly, along with the management of localized prostate cancer. We summarize current data on the efficacy of MRI for targeting cancer, compared with biopsies, in patients with previous negative prostate biopsies and persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The key clinical question is how many men benefit by having had prostate cancer detected purely because of the MRI-targeted, as opposed to standard scheme, biopsies. We reviewed all available databases for prospective studies in patients having MRI and prostate biopsy with previous negative biopsies and persistently elevated PSA levels. Six studies fulfilled the selection criteria, with 215 patients in all; in these studies, the cancer-detection rate at repeat biopsy was 21-40%. For MRI or combined MRI/MR spectroscopy, the overall sensitivity for predicting positive biopsies was 57-100%, the specificity 44-96% and the accuracy 67-85%. In five studies, specific MRI-targeted biopsies and standard cores were taken, with a significant proportion (34/63, 54%) having cancer detected purely because of the MRI-targeted cores. The value of endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopy in patients with elevated PSA levels and previous negative biopsies to target peripheral zone tumours appears to be significant. Although more data obtained with current technologies are needed, published results to data are encouraging. A comparison study and cost-benefit analysis of MRI-targeted vs saturation biopsy in this group of patients would also be ideal, to delineate any advantages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19154475     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  26 in total

Review 1.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Robotic palpation and mechanical property characterization for abnormal tissue localization.

Authors:  Bummo Ahn; Yeongjin Kim; Cheol Kyu Oh; Jung Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Multiparametric MRI of the prostate at 3 T: limited value of 3D (1)H-MR spectroscopy as a fourth parameter.

Authors:  Stephan H Polanec; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Peter Brader; Dietmar Georg; Shahrokh Shariat; Claudio Spick; Martin Susani; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [The relevance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection and exclusion of prostate cancer].

Authors:  J Stattaus; M Forsting
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Magnetic resonance tomography-guided interventional procedure for diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schernthaner; T H Helbich; B J Fueger; M Margreiter; M Memarsadeghi; A Stiglbauer; H-G Linhart; A Doan; K Pinker; P Brader
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  The Efficacy of Target Biopsy of Suspected Cancer Lesions Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and/or Transrectal Ultrasonography during Initial Prostate Biopsies: Comparison of Outcomes between Two Physicians.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Seiya Inoue; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Akihisa Yao; Masashi Honda; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 7.  Standards for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 8.  [Prostate biopsy. Update for indication, procedure, and future developments].

Authors:  S Machtens; A Roosen; C G Stief; M C Truß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Sandeep Sankineni; Arvin K George; Anna M Brown; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

10.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine.

Authors:  Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Seok-Min Han; Seong Ho Park; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Chang Gyu Seong; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.