Literature DB >> 19154371

Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.

Brian Hollis1, Janna L Fierst, David Houle.   

Abstract

Although theory indicates that indirect genetic benefits through mate choice should be widespread, empirical work has often either failed to detect the operation of such benefits or shown a net cost to the presence of sexual selection. We tested whether sexual selection can increase the speed with which a conditionally deleterious allele is removed from a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster. The alcohol dehydrogenase null allele (Adh-) confers slightly lower viability than wild-type alleles in the absence of ethanol but is lethal in homozygotes when ethanol comprises 6% of the medium. We tracked the frequency of this allele in artificially constructed populations reared at three different levels of ethanol (0%, 2%, and 4%) that either experienced sexual selection or did not. Loss of the deleterious Adh- allele was more rapid when sexual selection was allowed to act, especially in the presence of ethanol. We also quantified the strength of both nonsexual and sexual selection against the Adh- allele using maximum-likelihood estimation. In contrast to recent experiments employing monogamy/polygamy designs, our results demonstrate a fitness benefit to sexual selection. This is consistent with the operation of good-genes female choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19154371     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00551.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  20 in total

1.  Are males the more 'sensitive' sex?

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Sexual selection protects against extinction.

Authors:  Alyson J Lumley; Łukasz Michalczyk; James J N Kitson; Lewis G Spurgin; Catriona A Morrison; Joanne L Godwin; Matthew E Dickinson; Oliver Y Martin; Brent C Emerson; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Genomic evidence that a sexually selected trait captures genome-wide variation and facilitates the purging of genetic load.

Authors:  Jonathan M Parrett; Sebastian Chmielewski; Eylem Aydogdu; Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Stephane Rombauts; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Wiesław Babik; Mateusz Konczal; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.100

Review 6.  Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Association between sex-biased gene expression and mutations with sex-specific phenotypic consequences in Drosophila.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sean C A Clark; Nathaniel P Sharp; Locke Rowe; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.

Authors:  Ben R Hopkins; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-06

10.  Selection on the Drosophila seminal fluid protein Acp62F.

Authors:  Alex Wong; Howard Rundle
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.