Literature DB >> 19153972

Use of internally nuclease-protected single-strand DNA oligonucleotides and silencing of the mismatch repair protein, MSH2, enhances the replication of corrected cells following gene editing.

Ioannis Papaioannou1, Petra Disterer, James S Owen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gene editing is potentially a powerful technology for introducing genetic changes by using short single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides (ssODNs). However, their efficiency is reduced by the mismatch repair system, especially MSH2, which may suppress gene editing, although findings vary depending on readout and type of oligonucleotide used. Additionally, successfully edited cells are reported to arrest at the S- or G2-phase. In the present study, we evaluate whether a novel ssODN design and down-regulation of MSH2 expression allows the isolation of replicating gene-edited cells.
METHODS: Cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing mutated enhanced green fluorescent protein were targeted with ssODNs of varying design, all capable of restoring fluorescence, which allows the monitoring of correction events by flow cytometry. Converted cells were isolated by cell sorting and grown to determine colony formation efficiencies. MSH2 expression was suppressed with small interfering RNA and the cell cycle distribution of cells transfected with ssODN was quantified by flow cytometry, following propidium iodide or DRAQ5 staining.
RESULTS: Although efficiency was higher using ssODN end-protected with phosphorothioate, the potential of edited cells to form colonies was lower than those targeted with unmodified ssODN. We established that ssODN transfection itself perturbs the cell cycle and that MSH2 gene silencing increases correction efficiency. In both cases, however, the effect was dependent on the positioning of the protected nucleotides. Importantly, when internally protected ssODN was used in combination with MSH2 suppression, a higher proportion of G1-phase corrected cells was observed 48-64 h after transfection.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of internally protected ssODN and downregulating cellular MSH2 activity may facilitate isolation of viable, actively replicating gene-edited cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19153972     DOI: 10.1002/jgm.1296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gene Med        ISSN: 1099-498X            Impact factor:   4.565


  22 in total

1.  Oligo-Mediated Recombineering and its Use for Making SNPs, Knockouts, Insertions, and Fusions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Kenan C Murphy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  RecA-independent single-stranded DNA oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis.

Authors:  Kenan C Murphy; Martin G Marinus
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2010-07-22

3.  Oligonucleotide delivery by nucleofection does not rescue the reduced proliferation phenotype of gene-edited cells.

Authors:  Paula Livingston; Bryan Strouse; Haley Perry; Mandula Borjigin; Pawel Bialk; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.486

4.  Regulation of Gene Editing Activity Directed by Single-Stranded Oligonucleotides and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems.

Authors:  Pawel Bialk; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Bryan Strouse; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Subtle gene modification in mouse ES cells: evidence for incorporation of unmodified oligonucleotides without induction of DNA damage.

Authors:  Marieke Aarts; Hein te Riele
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Strand bias influences the mechanism of gene editing directed by single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Kerry Falgowski; Carly Falgowski; Cassie York-Vickers; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  DNA damage response pathway and replication fork stress during oligonucleotide directed gene editing.

Authors:  Melissa Bonner; Bryan Strouse; Mindy Applegate; Paula Livingston; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 10.183

8.  Electrospun fiber membranes enable proliferation of genetically modified cells.

Authors:  Mandula Borjigin; Chris Eskridge; Rohina Niamat; Bryan Strouse; Pawel Bialk; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-02-27

9.  Proliferation of genetically modified human cells on electrospun nanofiber scaffolds.

Authors:  Mandula Borjigin; Bryan Strouse; Rohina A Niamat; Pawel Bialk; Chris Eskridge; Jingwei Xie; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 10.183

10.  Transformation with oligonucleotides creating clustered changes in the yeast genome.

Authors:  Gina P Rodriguez; Joseph B Song; Gray F Crouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.