Sutep Jaruratanasirikul1, Teeratad Sudsai. 1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla, Thailand. jasutep@medicine.psu.ac.th
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the t > MICs of imipenem between administration by a 2 h infusion with a 0.5 h infusion. METHODS: The study was a randomized three-way crossover in nine patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Each subject received imipenem in three regimens consecutively: (i) a 0.5 h infusion of 0.5 g every 6 h for 24 h; (ii) a 2 h infusion of 0.5 g every 6 h for 24 h; and (iii) a 2 h infusion of 1 g every 6 h for 24 h. RESULTS: Following the 0.5 h infusion of 0.5 g of imipenem, the percentages of the t > 4 x MICs of 4, 2 and 1 mg/L were 20.32 +/- 9.32%, 44.11 +/- 16.40% and 64.67 +/- 20.56% of a 6 h interval, respectively. For the 2 h infusion of 0.5 g of imipenem, the percentages of the t > 4 x MICs of 4, 2 and 1 mg/L were 17.71 +/- 19.27%, 53.75 +/- 19.30% and 76.54 +/- 17.36% of a 6 h interval, respectively. For the 2 h infusion of 1 g of imipenem, the percentages of the t > 4 x MICs of 4, 2 and 1 mg/L were 60.26 +/- 23.96%, 77.78 +/- 20.11% and 93.35 +/- 8.26% of a 6 h interval, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 h infusions of imipenem resulted in greater t > MICs than the 0.5 h infusion. For infections caused by pathogens with high MICs, a 2 h infusion of 1 g of imipenem every 6 h can provide plasma concentrations above the MIC of 4 mg/L for 60% of a 6 h interval.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the t > MICs of imipenem between administration by a 2 h infusion with a 0.5 h infusion. METHODS: The study was a randomized three-way crossover in nine patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Each subject received imipenem in three regimens consecutively: (i) a 0.5 h infusion of 0.5 g every 6 h for 24 h; (ii) a 2 h infusion of 0.5 g every 6 h for 24 h; and (iii) a 2 h infusion of 1 g every 6 h for 24 h. RESULTS: Following the 0.5 h infusion of 0.5 g of imipenem, the percentages of the t > 4 x MICs of 4, 2 and 1 mg/L were 20.32 +/- 9.32%, 44.11 +/- 16.40% and 64.67 +/- 20.56% of a 6 h interval, respectively. For the 2 h infusion of 0.5 g of imipenem, the percentages of the t > 4 x MICs of 4, 2 and 1 mg/L were 17.71 +/- 19.27%, 53.75 +/- 19.30% and 76.54 +/- 17.36% of a 6 h interval, respectively. For the 2 h infusion of 1 g of imipenem, the percentages of the t > 4 x MICs of 4, 2 and 1 mg/L were 60.26 +/- 23.96%, 77.78 +/- 20.11% and 93.35 +/- 8.26% of a 6 h interval, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 h infusions of imipenem resulted in greater t > MICs than the 0.5 h infusion. For infections caused by pathogens with high MICs, a 2 h infusion of 1 g of imipenem every 6 h can provide plasma concentrations above the MIC of 4 mg/L for 60% of a 6 h interval.
Authors: Andrea Endimiani; Federico Perez; Saralee Bajaksouzian; Anne R Windau; Caryn E Good; Yuvraj Choudhary; Andrea M Hujer; Christopher R Bethel; Robert A Bonomo; Michael R Jacobs Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Femke de Velde; Brenda C M de Winter; Michael N Neely; Jan Strojil; Walter M Yamada; Stephan Harbarth; Angela Huttner; Teun van Gelder; Birgit C P Koch; Anouk E Muller Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 6.321