| Literature DB >> 19152682 |
Mariska van Vliet1, Inès A von Rosenstiel, Roger K Schindhelm, Desiderius P M Brandjes, Jos H Beijnen, Michaela Diamant.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors between different ethnic groups are largely unknown. We determined the variation in cardiometabolic risk profile according to ethnicity in a cohort overweight/obese Dutch children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19152682 PMCID: PMC2642775 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-8-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Anthropometric and cardiometabolic characteristics according to ethnicity
| Dutch Native | Turkish | Moroccan | Other | ||
| N (%) | 95 (18.4) | 145 (28.1) | 133 (25.8) | 143 (27.7) | - |
| Male (%) | 49.5 | 60.7 | 56.4 | 52.4 | 0.19 |
| Pubertal (%) | 55.8 | 63.4 | 57.1 | 56.6 | 0.80 |
| Age (years) | 11 ± 3 | 11 ± 3 | 10 ± 3 | 11 ± 3 | 0.23 |
| Z-BMI | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.5* | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 4.5 | 0.03 |
| Z-WC | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 3.9 ± 1.3 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 0.16 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 116 ± 11 | 116 ± 12 | 113 ± 11 | 115 ± 12 | 0.11 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 71 ± 8 | 73 ± 9† | 70 ± 8 | 71 ± 8 | 0.02 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 0.17 |
| 2-h plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5.8 ± 0.9 | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 5.7 ± 0.9 | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 0.083 |
| Fasting plasma insulin (pmol/L) | 95 (65–165) | 112 (83–167)‡ | 90 (58–138) | 112 (71–188)† | 0.002 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.1 (2.0–5.4) | 3.6 (2.6–5.7)‡ | 3.0 (1.8–4.7) | 3.5 (2.4–6.1)† | 0.003 |
| HOMA-B | 159 (109–258) | 177 (120–251)‡ | 138 (99–204) | 174 (112–288)† | 0.004 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 0.23 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.1 (0.9–1.2) | 1.0 (0.9–1.2)‡ | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | 0.014 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 0.7 | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 0.075 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.9 (0.6–1.3) | 0.9 (0.6–1.3)‡ | 0.7 (0.5–1.0) | 1.1 (0.7–1.2)† | 0.004 |
Data are mean ± SD and n (%) or median (interquartile range) for variables with a skewed distribution. P-values are given for comparisons between ethnic groups, tested with ANOVA.
SD-standard deviation; Z-BMI-standard deviation score of BMI; Z-WC-standard deviation score of waist circumference; HOMA-IR-Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; HOMA-B-Homeostatis Model Assessment for pancreatic β-cell function
*P < 0.05 compared to Dutch native children, †P < 0.05 compared to Moroccan children, ‡P < 0.01 compared to Moroccan children.
Figure 1Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (A), low HDL-cholesterol (B), high triglycerides (C), hypertension (D), impaired glucose tolerance (E) and impaired fasting glucose (F) according to ethnicity; Dutch native (white bars), Turkish (light grey bars), Moroccan (dark grey bars), and 'other' (black bars). * χ2 test, all P < 0.05.
Figure 2Prevalences of number of components of the metabolic syndrome; no components (A), one component (B), two components (C), and three or more components (D) according to ethnic group; Dutch native (white bars), Turkish (light grey bars), Moroccan (dark grey bars), and 'other' (black bars). * χ2 test, P < 0.05. † χ2 test, P < 0.001.
Associations of insulin resistance with (three components of) MetS and IFG
| Dutch Native | Turkish | Moroccan | Other | |
| 95 (18.4) | 145 (28.1) | 133 (25.8) | 145 (27.7) | |
| MetS | 2.1 (0.8–6.9)c | 5.0 (1.7–14.6)*c | 7.0 (2.1–23.1)* | 3.3 (1.2–8.9)† |
| IFG | 5.0 (1.5–16.7)* | 3.1 (1.3–7.2)*a | 5.4 (2.3–12.9)* | 4.8 (1.6–13.9)*a, b |
| Low HDL-cholesterol | 1.4 (0.5–3.5)c | 4.5 (2.1–9.6)* | 3.1 (1.1–8.9)†b, c | 2.1 (0.9–4.8)b |
| High Triglycerides | 3.8 (1.3–10.9)† | 2.4 (0.9–6.3)c | 5.2 (1.3–20.4)†b | 4.1 (1.3–12.9)†b |
| Hypertension | 1.2 (0.4–3.5)a, b, c | 0.7 (0.3–1.6)b, c | 6.2 (1.8–21.1)*b | 1.4 (0.5–3.6)a, b |
Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) are given for the associations of insulin resistance (binary variable) with the components comprising MetS and IFG (after adjustment for confounders; asex, bage, cZ-BMI), with logistic regression analysis.
*P < 0.01
†P < 0.05
HOMA-IR-Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; MetS-metabolic syndrome; IFG-Impaired Fasting Glucose, IGT-Impaired Glucose Intolerance