BACKGROUND: Despite known benefits to needle biopsy for suspicious breast lesions, variability in the use of this technique has been documented in practice. We sought to study the use of needle biopsy and open surgical biopsy in women with breast cancer, predictors of needle biopsy use, and the effect of biopsy choice on overall number of surgical procedures needed to treat breast cancer. METHODS: We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for 45,542 women diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 with ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I-II breast cancer. By using diagnosis and procedure codes from 3 months before to 6 months after the SEER diagnosis, we classified the initial biopsy as needle or surgical. By using multivariate logistic regression, we identified patient and tumor characteristics associated with needle biopsy use, and estimated the association between initial biopsy type and likelihood for multiple breast surgeries. RESULTS: Needle biopsy was the initial procedure for 11,073 (24.3%) women. In multivariate analyses, needle biopsy use varied significantly by race, year of diagnosis, and tumor size. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, needle biopsy use was associated with a reduced likelihood of multiple breast surgeries (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Use of needle biopsy as the initial breast cancer procedure was more common among black women and those with larger tumors, and increased significantly over time. Providers should consider needle biopsy when clinically feasible as the initial breast procedure, because it may reduce the number of surgeries needed to treat breast cancer. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Despite known benefits to needle biopsy for suspicious breast lesions, variability in the use of this technique has been documented in practice. We sought to study the use of needle biopsy and open surgical biopsy in women with breast cancer, predictors of needle biopsy use, and the effect of biopsy choice on overall number of surgical procedures needed to treat breast cancer. METHODS: We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for 45,542 women diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 with ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I-II breast cancer. By using diagnosis and procedure codes from 3 months before to 6 months after the SEER diagnosis, we classified the initial biopsy as needle or surgical. By using multivariate logistic regression, we identified patient and tumor characteristics associated with needle biopsy use, and estimated the association between initial biopsy type and likelihood for multiple breast surgeries. RESULTS: Needle biopsy was the initial procedure for 11,073 (24.3%) women. In multivariate analyses, needle biopsy use varied significantly by race, year of diagnosis, and tumor size. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, needle biopsy use was associated with a reduced likelihood of multiple breast surgeries (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Use of needle biopsy as the initial breast cancer procedure was more common among black women and those with larger tumors, and increased significantly over time. Providers should consider needle biopsy when clinically feasible as the initial breast procedure, because it may reduce the number of surgeries needed to treat breast cancer. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Donna Buono; Russell B McBride; Wei Yann Tsai; Kathy Ann Joseph; Victor R Grann; Judith S Jacobson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-01-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Nina P Tamirisa; Kristin M Sheffield; Abhishek D Parmar; Christopher J Zimmermann; Deepak Adhikari; Gabriela M Vargas; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Tracy M Layne; Jenerius A Aminawung; Pamela R Soulos; Marcella Nunez-Smith; Maxine A Nunez; Beth A Jones; Karen H Wang; Cary P Gross Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Shailesh Advani; Linn Abraham; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; John T Schousboe; Joshua Demb; Dongyu Zhang; Louise C Walter; Christoph I Lee; Dejana Braithwaite; Ellen S O'Meara Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Christopher J Zimmermann; Kristin M Sheffield; Casey B Duncan; Yimei Han; Catherine D Cooksley; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jan M Eberth; Ying Xu; Grace L Smith; Yu Shen; Jing Jiang; Thomas A Buchholz; Kelly K Hunt; Dalliah M Black; Sharon H Giordano; Gary J Whitman; Wei Yang; Chan Shen; Linda Elting; Benjamin D Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alice K Fortune-Greeley; Stephanie B Wheeler; Anne-Marie Meyer; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Andrea K Biddle; Hyman B Muss; William R Carpenter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: V van Breest Smallenburg; J Nederend; A C Voogd; J W W Coebergh; M van Beek; F H Jansen; W J Louwman; L E M Duijm Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 7.640