Literature DB >> 19152430

Breast biopsy patterns and outcomes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data.

Christopher R Friese1, Bridget A Neville, Stephen B Edge, Michael J Hassett, Craig C Earle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite known benefits to needle biopsy for suspicious breast lesions, variability in the use of this technique has been documented in practice. We sought to study the use of needle biopsy and open surgical biopsy in women with breast cancer, predictors of needle biopsy use, and the effect of biopsy choice on overall number of surgical procedures needed to treat breast cancer.
METHODS: We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for 45,542 women diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 with ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I-II breast cancer. By using diagnosis and procedure codes from 3 months before to 6 months after the SEER diagnosis, we classified the initial biopsy as needle or surgical. By using multivariate logistic regression, we identified patient and tumor characteristics associated with needle biopsy use, and estimated the association between initial biopsy type and likelihood for multiple breast surgeries.
RESULTS: Needle biopsy was the initial procedure for 11,073 (24.3%) women. In multivariate analyses, needle biopsy use varied significantly by race, year of diagnosis, and tumor size. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, needle biopsy use was associated with a reduced likelihood of multiple breast surgeries (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.37).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of needle biopsy as the initial breast cancer procedure was more common among black women and those with larger tumors, and increased significantly over time. Providers should consider needle biopsy when clinically feasible as the initial breast procedure, because it may reduce the number of surgeries needed to treat breast cancer. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19152430      PMCID: PMC3291169          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Quality of care for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ann Butler Nattinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; M S Gottlieb; J Veum; D Yahnke; J S Goodwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cost minimization study of image-guided core biopsy versus surgical excisional biopsy for women with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  Robert M Golub; Charles L Bennett; Tammy Stinson; Luz Venta; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Surgeon characteristics and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Donna Buono; Russell B McBride; Wei Yann Tsai; Kathy Ann Joseph; Victor R Grann; Judith S Jacobson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Racial differences in treatment and survival from early-stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Sue A Joslyn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Completeness of hospital cancer case reporting from the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  C Zippin; D Lum; B F Hankey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  11 in total

1.  Surgeon and Facility Variation in the Use of Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy in Texas.

Authors:  Nina P Tamirisa; Kristin M Sheffield; Abhishek D Parmar; Christopher J Zimmermann; Deepak Adhikari; Gabriela M Vargas; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Quality Of Breast Cancer Care In The US Territories: Insights From Medicare.

Authors:  Tracy M Layne; Jenerius A Aminawung; Pamela R Soulos; Marcella Nunez-Smith; Maxine A Nunez; Beth A Jones; Karen H Wang; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Local control of ductal carcinoma in situ based on tumor and patient characteristics: the surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Breast biopsy patterns and findings among older women undergoing screening mammography: The role of age and comorbidity.

Authors:  Shailesh Advani; Linn Abraham; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; John T Schousboe; Joshua Demb; Dongyu Zhang; Louise C Walter; Christoph I Lee; Dejana Braithwaite; Ellen S O'Meara
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Time trends and geographic variation in use of minimally invasive breast biopsy.

Authors:  Christopher J Zimmermann; Kristin M Sheffield; Casey B Duncan; Yimei Han; Catherine D Cooksley; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Surgeon influence on use of needle biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a national medicare study.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Ying Xu; Grace L Smith; Yu Shen; Jing Jiang; Thomas A Buchholz; Kelly K Hunt; Dalliah M Black; Sharon H Giordano; Gary J Whitman; Wei Yang; Chan Shen; Linda Elting; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Preoperative breast MRI and surgical outcomes in elderly women with invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Alice K Fortune-Greeley; Stephanie B Wheeler; Anne-Marie Meyer; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Andrea K Biddle; Hyman B Muss; William R Carpenter
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Improved branch and bound algorithm for detecting SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer.

Authors:  Li-Yeh Chuang; Hsueh-Wei Chang; Ming-Cheng Lin; Cheng-Hong Yang
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2013-02-14

9.  The Payer and Patient Cost Burden of Open Breast Conserving Procedures Following Percutaneous Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Chloe C Kimball; Christine I Nichols; Joshua G Vose
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2018-06-04

10.  Trends in breast biopsies for abnormalities detected at screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  V van Breest Smallenburg; J Nederend; A C Voogd; J W W Coebergh; M van Beek; F H Jansen; W J Louwman; L E M Duijm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.