Literature DB >> 19152231

Dose selection in seamless phase II/III clinical trials based on efficacy and safety.

Peter K Kimani1, Nigel Stallard, Jane L Hutton.   

Abstract

Seamless phase II/III clinical trials are attractive in development of new drugs because they accelerate the drug development process. Seamless phase II/III trials are carried out in two stages. After stage 1 (phase II stage), an interim analysis is performed and a decision is made on whether to proceed to stage 2 (phase III stage). If the decision is to continue with further testing, some dose-selection procedure is used to determine the set of doses to be tested in stage 2. In this paper, we propose a dose-selection procedure for binary outcomes in adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials that incorporates the dose-response relationship when the experimental treatments are different dose levels of the same drug, and explicitly incorporates both efficacy and safety. The choice of the doses to continue to stage 2 is made by comparing the predictive power of the potential sets of doses, which might continue.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19152231     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

2.  Controlled multi-arm platform design using predictive probability.

Authors:  Brian P Hobbs; Nan Chen; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Conditionally unbiased estimation in phase II/III clinical trials with early stopping for futility.

Authors:  Peter K Kimani; Susan Todd; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Optimizing the data combination rule for seamless phase II/III clinical trials.

Authors:  Lisa V Hampson; Christopher Jennison
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimation after subpopulation selection in adaptive seamless trials.

Authors:  Peter K Kimani; Susan Todd; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Adaptive Multivariate Global Testing.

Authors:  Giorgos Minas; John A D Aston; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  A comparison of methods for treatment selection in seamless phase II/III clinical trials incorporating information on short-term endpoints.

Authors:  Cornelia Ursula Kunz; Tim Friede; Nicholas Parsons; Susan Todd; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.051

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.