Literature DB >> 19148562

Medial-to-lateral ratio of tibiofemoral subchondral bone area is adapted to alignment and mechanical load.

Felix Eckstein1, Martin Hudelmaier, September Cahue, Meredith Marshall, Leena Sharma.   

Abstract

Malalignment is known to affect the medial-to-lateral load distribution in the tibiofemoral joint. In this longitudinal study, we test the hypothesis that subchondral bone surface areas functionally adapt to the load distribution in malaligned knees. Alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle) was measured from full limb films in 174 participants with knee osteoarthritis. Coronal magnetic resonance images were acquired at baseline and 26.6 +/- 5.4 months later. The subchondral bone surface area of the weight-bearing tibiofemoral cartilages was segmented, with readers blinded to the order of acquisition. The size of the subchondral bone surface areas was computed after triangulation by proprietary software. The hip-knee-ankle angle showed a significant correlation with the tibial (r (2) = 0.25, P < 0.0001) and femoral (r (2) = 0.07, P < 0.001) ratio of medial-to-lateral subchondral bone surface area. In the tibia, the ratio was significantly different between varus (1.28:1), neutral (1.18:1), and valgus (1.13:1) knees (analysis of variance [ANOVA]; P < 0.00001). Similar observations were made in the weight-bearing femur (0.94:1 in neutral, 0.97.1 in varus, 0.91:1 in valgus knees; ANOVA P = 0.018). The annualized longitudinal increase in subchondral bone surface area was significant (P < 0.05) in the medial tibia (+0.13%), medial femur (+0.26%), and lateral tibia (+0.19%). In the medial femur, the change between baseline and follow-up was significantly different (ANOVA; P = 0.020) between neutral, varus, and valgus knees, with the increase in surface area being significantly greater (P = 0.019) in varus than in neutral knees. Tibiofemoral subchondral bone surface areas are shown to be functionally adapted to the medial-to-lateral load distribution. The longitudinal findings indicate that this adaptational process may continue to take place at advanced age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19148562      PMCID: PMC2929533          DOI: 10.1007/s00223-008-9208-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  43 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Ruimerman; G H van Lenthe; J D Janssen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Articular area responses to mechanical loading: effects of exercise, age, and skeletal location.

Authors:  D E Lieberman; M J Devlin; O M Pearson
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; A B Ryals; J P Case; J A Block; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; M Wada; H Kawahara; M Sato; H Baba; S Shimada
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; H Cecil Charles; Robert J Buck; Virginia B Kraus; Ann E Remmers; Martin Hudelmaier; Wolfgang Wirth; Jeffrey L Evelhoch
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-10

6.  Functional adaptation of human joints to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  F Eckstein; S Faber; R Mühlbauer; J Hohe; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser; R Putz
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Burgkart; C Glaser; S Hinterwimmer; M Hudelmaier; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser; F Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-10

8.  Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females.

Authors:  G Jones; Changhai Ding; F Scott; M Glisson; F Cicuttini
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters.

Authors:  Heiko Graichen; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Thomas Vogl; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-03

10.  Femoro-tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test-retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Christian Glaser; Rainer Burgkart; Andrea Kutschera; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Maximilian Reiser; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  10 in total

1.  Morphometric differences between the medial and lateral meniscus in healthy men - a three-dimensional analysis using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Bloecker; W Wirth; M Hudelmaier; R Burgkart; R Frobell; F Eckstein
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.481

2.  Differences in subchondral bone size after one year in osteoarthritic and healthy knees.

Authors:  M Hudelmaier; W Wirth
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Quantitative cartilage imaging in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2010-12-08

4.  The relationship between clinical characteristics, radiographic osteoarthritis and 3D bone area: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  A J Barr; B Dube; E M A Hensor; S R Kingsbury; G Peat; M A Bowes; P G Conaghan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Statistical modeling of the equine third metacarpal bone incorporating morphology and bone mineral density.

Authors:  Helen Liley; Ju Zhang; Elwyn C Firth; Justin W Fernandez; Thor F Besier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Association between knee alignment, osteoarthritis disease severity, and subchondral trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xuequan Han; Junqi Cui; Kai Xie; Xu Jiang; Zihao He; Jingke Du; Linyang Chu; Xinhua Qu; Songtao Ai; Qi Sun; Liao Wang; Haishan Wu; Weituo Zhang; Zhifeng Yu; Mengning Yan
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Effect of high tibial osteotomy on joint loading in symptomatic patients with varus aligned knees: a study using SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Armin Mucha; Milos Dordevic; Anna Hirschmann; Helmut Rasch; Felix Amsler; Markus P Arnold; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Association of physical activity and physical performance with tibial cartilage volume and bone area in young adults.

Authors:  Benny Antony; Alison Venn; Flavia Cicuttini; Lyn March; Leigh Blizzard; Terence Dwyer; Marita Cross; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Antti Jaroma; Tarja Soininvaara; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The relationship between three-dimensional knee MRI bone shape and total knee replacement-a case control study: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Andrew J Barr; Bright Dube; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Sarah R Kingsbury; George Peat; Mike A Bowes; Linda D Sharples; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 7.580

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.