Literature DB >> 14648571

Femoro-tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test-retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis.

Christian Glaser1, Rainer Burgkart, Andrea Kutschera, Karl-Hans Englmeier, Maximilian Reiser, Felix Eckstein.   

Abstract

MRI-based measures of cartilage morphology are being increasingly used as surrogate markers in osteoarthritis. In contrast to other knee joint surfaces, quantitative analysis of the femoral condyles from sagittal MRI suffers from limited precision. The objective, therefore, was to develop a technique for reproducible assessment of femoral cartilage morphology from coronal image data. Coronal MR images (3D T(1)-w FLASHwe) of the knee were obtained in 16 healthy volunteers and in 7 patients with severe osteoarthritis (OA, prior to knee arthroplasty), with repositioning between repeated scans. After segmentation the cartilage volume, thickness, and joint surface areas were quantified in the tibia and in an anatomically defined region of the femoral condyle. Immediate test-retest interscan precision errors (CV%) for femoral cartilage volume were 3.0% (SD = 26 microl) and 3.2% (29 microl) medially and laterally in volunteers, and 3.0% (34 microl) and 7.0% (37 microl) in OA patients. The estimated loss, from cross sectional data, in the patients in the medial femoral condyle (-61%/-4.4 SD) was higher than that in the medial tibia (-45%/-3.1 SD) and compared favorably with precision errors (ratio > 16:1). The technique proposed overcomes some of the problems associated with sagittal scans and thus shows high promise for reliable assessment of femoro-tibial cartilage loss in OA. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648571     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  22 in total

1.  Comparison between different implementations of the 3D FLASH sequence for knee cartilage quantification.

Authors:  Martin Hudelmaier; Christian Glaser; Christian Pfau; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of weight-bearing subchondral trabecular bone in the knee.

Authors:  Erika Schneider; Grace H Lo; Gretchen Sloane; Lynn Fanella; David J Hunter; Charles B Eaton; Timothy E McAlindon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Reproducibility and repeatability of quantitative sodium magnetic resonance imaging in vivo in articular cartilage at 3 T and 7 T.

Authors:  Guillaume Madelin; James S Babb; Ding Xia; Gregory Chang; Alexej Jerschow; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Femorotibial and patellar cartilage loss in patients prior to total knee arthroplasty, heterogeneity, and correlation with alignment of the knee.

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Graichen; M Hudelmaier; T Vogl; L Sharma; F Eckstein
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  The effect of a six-month training program followed by a marathon run on knee joint cartilage volume and thickness in marathon beginners.

Authors:  Stefan Hinterwimmer; Matthias J Feucht; Corinna Steinbrech; Heiko Graichen; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Medial-to-lateral ratio of tibiofemoral subchondral bone area is adapted to alignment and mechanical load.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Martin Hudelmaier; September Cahue; Meredith Marshall; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; E Schneider; M Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Quantitative MR imaging using "LiveWire" to measure tibiofemoral articular cartilage thickness.

Authors:  M E Bowers; N Trinh; G A Tung; J J Crisco; B B Kimia; B C Fleming
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Kunz; M Schutzer; M Hudelmaier; R D Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status.

Authors:  F Eckstein; S Maschek; W Wirth; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; B Wyman; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.