OBJECTIVE: To compare postprandial glucose excursions and plasma free insulin-analogue levels after subcutaneous injection of three novel human insulin analogues (AspB10; AspB9, GluB27; and AspB28) with those after injection of soluble human insulin (Actrapid HM U-100). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six male subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes, at least 1 wk apart and after an overnight fast and basal insulin infusion, received 72 nmol (approximately 12 U) s.c. of soluble human insulin 30 min before, or 72 nmol of each of the three analogues immediately before, a standard 500-kcal meal. RESULTS: Mean basal glucoses were similar on the 4 study days. Compared to human insulin (6.3 +/- 0.8 mM), mean +/- SE peak incremental glucose rises were similar after analogues AspB10 (5.4 +/- 0.8 mM) and AspB9, GluB27 (5.4 +/- 0.7 mM) and significantly lower after analogue AspB28 (3.6 +/- 1.2 mM, P less than 0.02). Relative to soluble human insulin (100% +/- SE21), incremental areas under the glucose curve between 0 and 240 min were 79% +/- 34 (AspB10, NS), 70% +/- 29 (AspB9, GluB27, NS), and 43% +/- 23 (AspB28, P less than 0.02). Basal plasma free insulin levels were similar on the 4 study days. Plasma free insulin-analogue levels rose rapidly to peak 30 min after injection at 308 +/- 44 pM (AspB10); 1231 +/- 190 pM (AspB9, GluB27) and 414 +/- 42 pM (AspB28) and were significantly higher than corresponding (i.e., 30 min postmeal) plasma free insulin levels of 157 +/- 15 pM (P less than 0.02 in each case). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma profiles of the insulin analogues were more physiological than that of human insulin after subcutaneous injection. All three analogues given immediately before the meal are at least as effective as soluble human insulin given 30 min earlier. These analogues are promising potential candidates for short-acting insulins of the future.
OBJECTIVE: To compare postprandial glucose excursions and plasma free insulin-analogue levels after subcutaneous injection of three novel humaninsulin analogues (AspB10; AspB9, GluB27; and AspB28) with those after injection of soluble humaninsulin (Actrapid HM U-100). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six male subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes, at least 1 wk apart and after an overnight fast and basal insulin infusion, received 72 nmol (approximately 12 U) s.c. of soluble humaninsulin 30 min before, or 72 nmol of each of the three analogues immediately before, a standard 500-kcal meal. RESULTS: Mean basal glucoses were similar on the 4 study days. Compared to humaninsulin (6.3 +/- 0.8 mM), mean +/- SE peak incremental glucose rises were similar after analogues AspB10 (5.4 +/- 0.8 mM) and AspB9, GluB27 (5.4 +/- 0.7 mM) and significantly lower after analogue AspB28 (3.6 +/- 1.2 mM, P less than 0.02). Relative to soluble humaninsulin (100% +/- SE21), incremental areas under the glucose curve between 0 and 240 min were 79% +/- 34 (AspB10, NS), 70% +/- 29 (AspB9, GluB27, NS), and 43% +/- 23 (AspB28, P less than 0.02). Basal plasma free insulin levels were similar on the 4 study days. Plasma free insulin-analogue levels rose rapidly to peak 30 min after injection at 308 +/- 44 pM (AspB10); 1231 +/- 190 pM (AspB9, GluB27) and 414 +/- 42 pM (AspB28) and were significantly higher than corresponding (i.e., 30 min postmeal) plasma free insulin levels of 157 +/- 15 pM (P less than 0.02 in each case). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma profiles of the insulin analogues were more physiological than that of humaninsulin after subcutaneous injection. All three analogues given immediately before the meal are at least as effective as soluble humaninsulin given 30 min earlier. These analogues are promising potential candidates for short-acting insulins of the future.
Authors: Qing-xin Hua; Satoe H Nakagawa; Wenhua Jia; Kun Huang; Nelson B Phillips; Shi-quan Hu; Michael A Weiss Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jason Wong; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas F Lotz; Jessica Lin; Aaron J Le Compte Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2008-07
Authors: Erin J Mansell; Signe Schmidt; Paul D Docherty; Kirsten Nørgaard; John B Jørgensen; Henrik Madsen Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Jason Wong; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas F Lotz; Jessica Lin; Aaron J Le Compte Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2008-07