UNLABELLED: Insulin aspart, a rapid-acting human insulin analogue, provides more rapid absorption than regular human insulin after subcutaneous administration. In most randomised, nonblind clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, insulin aspart administered immediately before meals resulted in significantly lower mean glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c ) (HbA(1c)) levels than regular human insulin (usually administered 30 minutes before a meal). Insulin aspart also significantly improved postprandial glycaemic control compared with regular human insulin. The efficacy of insulin aspart was similar to that of insulin lispro when administered to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus via continuous subcutaneous infusion in a randomised, nonblind trial. Preliminary data from randomised, nonblind trials suggest insulin aspart had a trend towards lower HbA(1c) levels compared with regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biphasic insulin aspart [30% soluble (rapid-acting) and 70% protamine-bound insulin aspart (BIAsp30)] generally provided significantly better postprandial glucose control than a similar mixture of biphasic regular human insulin (BHI30) in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the long-term efficacy of BIAsp30 was similar to that of BHI30 after 2 years in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus reported greater treatment satisfaction with insulin aspart or BIAsp30 than with regular human insulin or BHI30. The overall incidence of hypoglycaemia with insulin aspart was lower than, or similar to, that of regular human insulin. Moreover, insulin aspart tended to be associated with a lower occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemic events than regular human insulin. CONCLUSION: The standard preparation of insulin aspart has the potential to better mimic the physiological response to meals than regular human insulin. Insulin aspart when combined with a suitable basal insulin improved overall glycaemic control and led to a similar or lower number of hypoglycaemic episodes compared with a similar regular human insulin regimen. Insulin aspart was generally as effective and well tolerated as insulin lispro when administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion in a single comparative trial. The efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart has been documented in a small number of trials. Both insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart provide for flexible and convenient administration. Insulin aspart is now well established as an effective and convenient means of providing glycaemic control which offers clinical and practical advantages over regular human insulin.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Insulinaspart, a rapid-acting humaninsulin analogue, provides more rapid absorption than regular humaninsulin after subcutaneous administration. In most randomised, nonblind clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, insulinaspart administered immediately before meals resulted in significantly lower mean glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c ) (HbA(1c)) levels than regular humaninsulin (usually administered 30 minutes before a meal). Insulinaspart also significantly improved postprandial glycaemic control compared with regular humaninsulin. The efficacy of insulinaspart was similar to that of insulin lispro when administered to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus via continuous subcutaneous infusion in a randomised, nonblind trial. Preliminary data from randomised, nonblind trials suggest insulinaspart had a trend towards lower HbA(1c) levels compared with regular humaninsulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biphasic insulin aspart [30% soluble (rapid-acting) and 70% protamine-bound insulinaspart (BIAsp30)] generally provided significantly better postprandial glucose control than a similar mixture of biphasic regular humaninsulin (BHI30) in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the long-term efficacy of BIAsp30 was similar to that of BHI30 after 2 years in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus reported greater treatment satisfaction with insulinaspart or BIAsp30 than with regular humaninsulin or BHI30. The overall incidence of hypoglycaemia with insulin aspart was lower than, or similar to, that of regular humaninsulin. Moreover, insulinaspart tended to be associated with a lower occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemic events than regular humaninsulin. CONCLUSION: The standard preparation of insulinaspart has the potential to better mimic the physiological response to meals than regular humaninsulin. Insulinaspart when combined with a suitable basal insulin improved overall glycaemic control and led to a similar or lower number of hypoglycaemic episodes compared with a similar regular humaninsulin regimen. Insulinaspart was generally as effective and well tolerated as insulin lispro when administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion in a single comparative trial. The efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart has been documented in a small number of trials. Both insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart provide for flexible and convenient administration. Insulinaspart is now well established as an effective and convenient means of providing glycaemic control which offers clinical and practical advantages over regular humaninsulin.
Authors: Marcin Czech; Elżbieta Rdzanek; Justyna Pawęska; Olga Adamowicz-Sidor; Maciej Niewada; Michał Jakubczyk Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 2.763