Literature DB >> 19146297

Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries.

Jeroen J A van Boxtel1, Tomas Knapen, Casper J Erkelens, Raymond van Ee.   

Abstract

When the two eyes are presented with conflicting stimuli, perception starts to fluctuate over time (i.e., binocular rivalry). A similar fluctuation occurs when two patterns are presented to a single eye (i.e., monocular rivalry), or when they are swapped rapidly and repeatedly between the eyes (i.e., stimulus rivalry). Although all these cases lead to rivalry, in quantitative terms these modes of rivalry are generally found to differ significantly. We studied these different modes of rivalry with identical intermittently shown stimuli while varying the temporal layout of stimulation. We show that the quantitative differences between the modes of rivalry are caused by the presence of monocular interactions between the rivaling patterns; the introduction of a blank period just before a stimulus swap changed the number of rivalry reports to the extent that monocular and stimulus rivalries were inducible over ranges of spatial frequency content and contrast values that were nearly identical to binocular rivalry. Moreover when monocular interactions did not occur the perceptual dynamics of monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries were statistically indistinguishable. This range of identical behavior exhibited a monocular (approximately 50 ms) and a binocular (approximately 350 ms) limit. We argue that a common binocular, or pattern-based, mechanism determines the temporal constraints for these modes of rivalry.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146297     DOI: 10.1167/8.15.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of attention on visual experience during monocular rivalry.

Authors:  Eric A Reavis; Peter J Kohler; Gideon P Caplovitz; Thalia P Wheatley; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Bistable percepts in the brain: FMRI contrasts monocular pattern rivalry and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Samuel Jessula; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  High-level binocular rivalry effects.

Authors:  Michal Wolf; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  On the Discovery of Monocular Rivalry by Tscherning in 1898: Translation and Review.

Authors:  Robert P O'Shea; Urte Roeber; Nicholas J Wade
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-29

9.  Common contextual influences in ambiguous and rivalrous figures.

Authors:  Marouane Ouhnana; Ben J Jennings; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry.

Authors:  Jens H Christiansen; Anthony D D'Antona; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.