Literature DB >> 19146242

Contextual modulations of center-surround interactions in motion revealed with the motion aftereffect.

Duje Tadin1, Chris L E Paffen, Randolph Blake, Joseph S Lappin.   

Abstract

Segregation of objects from their backgrounds is one of vision's most important tasks and one that is accomplished with ease. It is often hypothesized that suppressive center-surround receptive field interactions represent a key neural substrate underlying efficient figure-ground segregation, yet this intuitively appealing hypothesis has received very little experimental support. Using the motion aftereffect as an experimental tool, we explored this hypothesis by examining how surround suppression was affected by contextual manipulations that altered the perceived figure-ground relations but kept local motion signals unchanged. The results demonstrated that surround suppression was strong when the visual context implied a large moving field. On the other hand, when the contextual interpretation was consistent with a smaller moving object, surround suppression was greatly reduced. These findings are consistent with the notion that center-surround interactions play a role in segregating moving objects from backgrounds.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146242     DOI: 10.1167/8.7.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  10 in total

1.  Changes in perceived temporal variation due to context: contributions from two distinct neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Anthony D D'Antona; Jan Kremers; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Suppressive mechanisms in visual motion processing: From perception to intelligence.

Authors:  Duje Tadin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatiotemporal Filter for Visual Motion Integration from Pursuit Eye Movements in Humans and Monkeys.

Authors:  Trishna Mukherjee; Bing Liu; Claudio Simoncini; Leslie C Osborne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  When can attention influence binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Increasing stimulus size impairs first- but not second-order motion perception.

Authors:  Davis M Glasser; Duje Tadin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Low-level mechanisms do not explain paradoxical motion percepts.

Authors:  Davis M Glasser; Duje Tadin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The neural basis of centre-surround interactions in visual motion processing.

Authors:  Christina Moutsiana; David T Field; John P Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dynamics of contextual modulation of perceived shape in human vision.

Authors:  Elena Gheorghiu; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Spatial suppression promotes rapid figure-ground segmentation of moving objects.

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Woon Ju Park; Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Joseph S Lappin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.