Literature DB >> 1914562

Pressure support. Changes in ventilatory pattern and components of the work of breathing.

W B Van de Graaff1, K Gordey, S E Dornseif, D J Dries, B S Kleinman, P Kumar, M Mathru.   

Abstract

To evaluate the interaction between patient and ventilator during widely varying levels of pressure support (PS) ventilation, we studied 33 patients who had undergone aortocoronary bypass. All patients were without preoperative evidence of lung disease and had left ventricular ejection fractions greater than 45 percent. We assessed both changes in ventilatory pattern and the use of an extension of the Campbell technique to determine the components of the mechanical work of breathing (WOB). Patients were placed on 0, 10, 20, and 30 cm H2O of PS. We found that increasing the pressure support level (PSL) did not change minute ventilation, PCO2, or pH despite large changes in both rate and depth of breathing. The inspiratory time fraction was consistently and progressively reduced as PS increased. Although mean inspiratory flow (MIF) increased by 75 +/- 9 (SE) percent as the PSL increased to 30 cm H2O, mean airway pressure rose only 3.5 +/- 0.1 cm H2O. Observed changes in the resistive and elastic components of WOB at PSL greater than 0 were consistent with values predicted from baseline observations and changes in VT and MIF demonstrating that the Campbell technique of separating resistive and elastic components of the patient's WOB during unassisted ventilation can be extended to the analysis of WOB during mechanical ventilation. We were surprised to observe that although inspiratory WOB fell 67 +/- 13 percent as the PSL increased to 30 cm H2O, postinspiratory work by the inspiratory muscles (WOBPIIM) did not show significant change. The persistence and substantial values of WOBPIIM in some patients suggested the presence of significant patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, especially at higher levels of PS. Total inspiratory WOB per minute, including both patient WOB and WOB by the ventilator, increased by 186 +/- 29 percent, demonstrating that PS results in a respiratory pattern requiring substantially greater total mechanical work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1914562     DOI: 10.1378/chest.100.4.1082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

1.  Work of breathing-tidal volume relationship: analysis on an in vitro model and clinical implications.

Authors:  G Natalini; D M Tuzzo; G Comunale; F A Rasulo; G Amicucci; A Candiani
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Acute effects of hyperoxemia on dyspnoea and respiratory variables during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Carlo Alberto Volta; Valentina Alvisi; Sara Bertacchini; Elisabetta Marangoni; Riccardo Ragazzi; Marco Verri; Raffaele Alvisi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Advances in neonatal conventional ventilation.

Authors:  S K Sinha; S M Donn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Changes in occlusion pressure (P0.1) and breathing pattern during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  P F Perrigault; Y H Pouzeratte; S Jaber; X J Capdevila; M Hayot; G Boccara; M Ramonatxo; P Colson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 5.  [Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) : From pathophysiology to clinical evaluation with differentiated management].

Authors:  Benjamin Neetz; Thomas Flohr; Felix J F Herth; Michael M Müller
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  Chest wall mechanics during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Andrea Aliverti; Eleonora Carlesso; Raffaele Dellacà; Paolo Pelosi; Davide Chiumello; Antonio Pedotti; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.