Literature DB >> 19145411

Smelling, tasting, learning: Drosophila as a study case.

B Gerber1, R F Stocker, T Tanimura, A S Thum.   

Abstract

Understanding brain function is to account for how the sensory system is integrated with the organism's needs to organize behaviour. We review what is known about these processes with regard to chemosensation and chemosensory learning in Drosophila. We stress that taste and olfaction are organized rather differently. Given that, e.g., sugars are nutrients and should be eaten (irrespective of the kind of sugar) and that toxic substances should be avoided (regardless of the kind of death they eventually cause), tastants are classified into relatively few behavioural matters of concern. In contrast, what needs to be done in response to odours is less evolutionarily determined. Thus, discrimination ability is warranted between different kinds of olfactory input, as any difference between odours may potentially be or become important. Therefore, the olfactory system has a higher dimensionality than gustation, and allows for more sensory-motor flexibility to attach acquired behavioural 'meaning' to odours. We argue that, by and large, larval and adult Drosophila are similar in these kinds of architecture, and that additionally there are a number of similarities to vertebrates, in particular regarding the cellular architecture of the olfactory pathway, the functional slant of the taste and smell systems towards classification versus discrimination, respectively, and the higher plasticity of the olfactory sensory-motor system. From our point of view, the greatest gap in understanding smell and taste systems to date is not on the sensory side, where indeed impressive advances have been achieved; also, a satisfying account of associative odour-taste memory trace formation seems within reach. Rather, we lack an understanding as to how sensory and motor formats of processing are centrally integrated, and how adaptive motor patterns actually are selected. Such an understanding, we believe, will allow the analysis to be extended to the motivating factors of behaviour, eventually leading to a comprehensive account of those systems which make Drosophila do what Drosophila's got to do.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145411     DOI: 10.1007/400_2008_9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ        ISSN: 0080-1844


  41 in total

1.  Drosophila larvae establish appetitive olfactory memories via mushroom body neurons of embryonic origin.

Authors:  Dennis Pauls; Mareike Selcho; Nanae Gendre; Reinhard F Stocker; Andreas S Thum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Sensory perception and aging in model systems: from the outside in.

Authors:  Nancy J Linford; Tsung-Han Kuo; Tammy P Chan; Scott D Pletcher
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 13.827

3.  Mind the gap: olfactory trace conditioning in honeybees.

Authors:  Paul Szyszka; Christiane Demmler; Mariann Oemisch; Ludwig Sommer; Stephanie Biergans; Benjamin Birnbach; Ana F Silbering; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Aversive and Appetitive Learning in Drosophila Larvae: A Simple and Powerful Suite of Laboratory Modules for Classroom or Open-ended Research Projects.

Authors:  Austin Pavin; Kevin Fain; Allison DeHart; Divya Sitaraman
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2018-06-15

5.  Appetitive associative olfactory learning in Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  Anthi A Apostolopoulou; Annekathrin Widmann; Astrid Rohwedder; Johanna E Pfitzenmaier; Andreas S Thum
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  High-NaCl perception in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Georges Alves; Jérémy Sallé; Sylvie Chaudy; Stéphane Dupas; Gérard Manière
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Positive and negative gustatory inputs affect Drosophila lifespan partly in parallel to dFOXO signaling.

Authors:  Ivan Ostojic; Werner Boll; Michael J Waterson; Tammy Chan; Rashmi Chandra; Scott D Pletcher; Joy Alcedo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Potency of transgenic effectors for neurogenetic manipulation in Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  Dennis Pauls; Alina von Essen; Radostina Lyutova; Lena van Giesen; Ronny Rosner; Christian Wegener; Simon G Sprecher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Short-term memories in Drosophila are governed by general and specific genetic systems.

Authors:  Troy Zars
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Odour intensity learning in fruit flies.

Authors:  Ayse Yarali; Sabrina Ehser; Fatma Zehra Hapil; Ju Huang; Bertram Gerber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.