Literature DB >> 19145027

'100% of anything looks good': the appeal of one hundred percent.

Meng Li1, Gretchen B Chapman.   

Abstract

People overweight certainty, even when certainty is only an illusion. A vaccine that was described as 100% effective against 70% of disease targets was preferred to one described as 70% effective against 100% of disease targets (Studies 1 and 2). The appeal of 100% extends beyond the probability attribute. In Study 2, participants preferred both of the vaccines above to normatively equivalent vaccines that were less than 100% effective toward fewer than 100% of targets. In Study 3, participants preferred a 100% discount on a cup of coffee every 10 days to other more frequent, but lower amount, discounts. This preference evaporated, however, when savings were framed as points rather than as percentage discounts. We propose that people view 100% as a salient reference point and overweight it in those domains where it cannot be exceeded (e.g., probability, discount); the overweighting is weaker in domains where 100% can be exceeded (e.g., target range, points).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145027     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  3 in total

1.  On the shape of the probability weighting function.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; G Wu
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice.

Authors:  John Dickhaut; Kevin McCabe; Jennifer C Nagode; Aldo Rustichini; Kip Smith; José V Pardo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Preference for equity as a framing effect.

Authors:  P A Ubel; J Baron; D A Asch
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Neuroeconomics, health psychology, and the interdisciplinary study of preventative health behavior.

Authors:  Krista L DeStasio; John A Clithero; Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2019-10-23

2.  41st Annual North American Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making; October 21, 2019; Portland, Oregon Keynote Address The More Who Die, the Less We Care: Confronting the Deadly Arithmetic of Compassion.

Authors:  Paul Slovic
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2020-05-05

3.  Can We Do Better Next Time? Italians' Response to the COVID-19 Emergency through a Heuristics and Biases Lens.

Authors:  Raffaella Misuraca; Ursina Teuscher; Costanza Scaffidi Abbate; Francesco Ceresia; Michele Roccella; Lucia Parisi; Luigi Vetri; Silvana Miceli
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-07

4.  41st Annual North American Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making; October 21, 2019; Portland, Oregon Keynote Address The More Who Die, the Less We Care: Confronting the Deadly Arithmetic of Compassion.

Authors:  Paul Slovic
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.583

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.