Literature DB >> 12626760

The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice.

John Dickhaut1, Kevin McCabe, Jennifer C Nagode, Aldo Rustichini, Kip Smith, José V Pardo.   

Abstract

In this study we examine how the introduction of a reference lottery with nonrandom outcomes alters the way in which choices among pairs of lotteries are made, even if it does not alter the choices. We use different domains (some of the lotteries produce gains, other losses) and different contexts (one member of the pair, the reference lottery, may be either risky or certain). In our experiment, the change from gain to loss domain affects choices: subjects are risk averse in the gain domain, but not in the loss domain. On the contrary, the context effect of the certain lottery does not affect choices. However, the introduction of the certainty reference lottery affects two behavioral variables, response time and brain activation, in a dramatic way. This result suggests that the certainty lottery promotes a different process through which preferences are revealed, even if the differences among lotteries may not be large enough to induce different choices.

Year:  2003        PMID: 12626760      PMCID: PMC404302          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0530279100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

Review 1.  The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans.

Authors:  D Ongür; J L Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Automated detection of the intercommissural line for stereotactic localization of functional brain images.

Authors:  S Minoshima; R A Koeppe; M A Mintun; K L Berger; S F Taylor; K A Frey; D E Kuhl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Detection of thirty-second cognitive activations in single subjects with positron emission tomography: a new low-dose H2(15)O regional cerebral blood flow three-dimensional imaging technique.

Authors:  D A Silbersweig; E Stern; C D Frith; C Cahill; L Schnorr; S Grootoonk; T Spinks; J Clark; R Frackowiak; T Jones
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Anatomic standardization: linear scaling and nonlinear warping of functional brain images.

Authors:  S Minoshima; R A Koeppe; K A Frey; D E Kuhl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 10.057

  4 in total
  16 in total

1.  Component processes underlying choice.

Authors:  John T Cacioppo; Howard S Nusbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Beyond risk and ambiguity: deciding under ignorance.

Authors:  Helen Pushkarskaya; Xun Liu; Michael Smithson; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Approach-avoidance processes contribute to dissociable impacts of risk and loss on choice.

Authors:  Nicholas D Wright; Mkael Symmonds; Karen Hodgson; Thomas H B Fitzgerald; Bonni Crawford; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Risk preference instability across institutions: a dilemma.

Authors:  Joyce Berg; John Dickhaut; Kevin McCabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Neuroeconomics.

Authors:  Paul J Zak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Dual or unitary system? Two alternative models of decision making.

Authors:  Aldo Rustichini
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  A magnetoencephalography study of choice bias.

Authors:  William M Hedgcock; David A Crowe; Arthur C Leuthold; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor.

Authors:  J M Coates; J Herbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  '100% of anything looks good': the appeal of one hundred percent.

Authors:  Meng Li; Gretchen B Chapman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Action selection: a race model for selected and non-selected actions distinguishes the contribution of premotor and prefrontal areas.

Authors:  J B Rowe; L Hughes; I Nimmo-Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.