Literature DB >> 19144088

Choosing not to choose: reproductive responses of parents of children with genetic conditions or impairments.

Susan E Kelly1.   

Abstract

Parents of children with genetic conditions or impairments stand in a unique position with regard to choices and dilemmas posed by prenatal screening and testing options offered to at-risk parents as a means to a 'healthy' baby. This article reports the results of a qualitative study of parents whose children are clients of a state-wide rural genetic outreach programme in the US. The analysis seeks to connect the lived experience of parents of children with genetic conditions or impairments to choices with which women are confronted as prenatal testing technologies continue to proliferate. It reports the finding that a majority of parents in the study chose not to choose: avoiding future pregnancies, declining prenatal testing for subsequent pregnancies, or limiting testing to 'for information only'. These decisions do not reflect simple rejection of medical intervention, opposition to abortion, and/or affirmation of a positive parenting experience with an affected child. Rather, choosing to avoid the condition of choice appears to be a strategy of responsible parenting that emerges from ambivalence towards the options presented by reproductive technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19144088     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01110.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  15 in total

1.  "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren Carter Sayres; Taylor Goodspeed; Marsha Michie; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

2.  Reproductive Decision Making and Genetic Predisposition to Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Dorit Barlevy; David Wasserman; Marina Stolerman; Kathleen E Erskine; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19

3.  Enacting genetic responsibility: experiences of mothers who carry the fragile X gene.

Authors:  Kelly Raspberry; Debra Skinner
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2010-11-05

4.  Obligatory Effort [Hishtadlut] as an Explanatory Model: A Critique of Reproductive Choice and Control.

Authors:  Elly Teman; Tsipy Ivry; Heela Goren
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06

5.  'And then you can decide'--antenatal foetal diagnosis decision making in South Africa.

Authors:  Tina-Marié Wessels; Tom Koole; Claire Penn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Family Communication and Cascade Testing for Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Anne Edwards; Anne C Wheeler; Ellen Bishop; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Negotiating desires and options: how mothers who carry the fragile X gene experience reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Kelly Amanda Raspberry; Debra Skinner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: perspectives of South African parents of children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Chantelle Jennifer Scott; Merle Futter; Ambroise Wonkam
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-10-25

9.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Informed decision making about predictive DNA tests: arguments for more public visibility of personal deliberations about the good life.

Authors:  Marianne Boenink; Simone van der Burg
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2010-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.