Literature DB >> 19142669

Use of a lidocaine patch in the management of postsurgical neuropathic pain in patients with cancer: a phase III double-blind crossover study (N01CB).

Andrea L Cheville1, Jeff A Sloan, Donald W Northfelt, Anand P Jillella, Gilbert Y Wong, James D Bearden Iii, Heshan Liu, Paul L Schaefer, Benjamin T Marchello, Bradley J Christensen, Charles L Loprinzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current therapies often have limited efficacy and untenable side effects when used to treat persistent incisional pain following cancer-related surgery. Lidocaine patches reduce neuropathic pain from herpes zoster but their benefits for persistent cancer-related postsurgical incisional pain remain unclear. STUDY
DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, two-period crossover trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight cancer patients with postsurgical incisional pain were randomly assigned to receive either lidocaine patches followed by placebo patches or the reverse. Each study period lasted 4 weeks. Patches were applied daily upon waking and left in place for a maximum of 18 h. The primary outcome measure, an 11-point pain intensity rating scale, was administered weekly. Secondary outcomes were administered weekly (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form(BPI-SF), Subject Global Impression of Change) and at the end of each study period (Short Form-Magill Pain Questionnaire, Linear Analogue Self Assessment Scale, Neuropathy Pain Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Profile of Mood States Short Form).
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients completed the first period and 18 completed their crossover second phase. No significant intergroup differences were detected in pain intensity ratings. Few secondary end points were significantly different when subjects used the lidocaine versus placebo patches. BPI-SF interference scores were lower in patients using the lidocaine patch during the first study period, including several scores that achieved statistical significance, general activity (p = 0.02), work (p = 0.04), and relations with others (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Lidocaine patch use did not significantly reduce pain intensity ratings or the majority of related secondary end points in cancer patients with persistent incisional pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19142669      PMCID: PMC5653964          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0542-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  37 in total

Review 1.  Safety and tolerability of the lidocaine patch 5%, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Arnold R Gammaitoni; Nancy A Alvarez; Bradley S Galer
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enriched enrollment study.

Authors:  B S Galer; M C Rowbotham; J Perander; E Friedman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain.

Authors:  C J Woolf; M W Salter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Conclusions: chronic pain studies of lidocaine patch 5% using the Neuropathic Pain Scale.

Authors:  Charles E Argoff
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

Authors:  A Osman; F X Barrios; B A Kopper; W Hauptmann; J Jones; E O'Neill
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1997-12

Review 7.  Adjuvant analgesics in cancer pain management.

Authors:  David Lussier; Angela G Huskey; Russell K Portenoy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2004

8.  Long-term postthoracotomy pain.

Authors:  E Dajczman; A Gordon; H Kreisman; N Wolkove
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Lack of effect of coumarin in women with lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  C L Loprinzi; J W Kugler; J A Sloan; T W Rooke; S K Quella; P Novotny; R B Mowat; J C Michalak; P J Stella; R Levitt; L K Tschetter; H Windschitl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Chronic pain after surgery: what can we do to prevent it.

Authors:  Scott S Reuben
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2007-02
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic management of chronic neuropathic pain: Review of the Canadian Pain Society consensus statement.

Authors:  Alex Mu; Erica Weinberg; Dwight E Moulin; Hance Clarke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Lidocaine 5 % patches as an effective short-term co-analgesic in cancer pain. Preliminary results.

Authors:  Cristina Garzón-Rodríguez; Miquel Casals Merchan; Agnes Calsina-Berna; Eugenia López-Rómboli; Josep Porta-Sales
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Topical Treatment of Localized Neuropathic Pain in the Elderly.

Authors:  Gisèle Pickering; Camille Lucchini
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  [Current therapy of neuropathic pain].

Authors:  M Schäfers; T R Tölle
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Treatment of acute and chronic focal neuropathic pain in cancer patients with lidocaine 5 % patches. A radiation and oncology department experience.

Authors:  Escarlata López Ramírez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Use of lidocaine patches for neuropathic pain in a comprehensive cancer centre.

Authors:  Julia Ann Fleming; Bradley David O'Connor
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Reporting characteristics of cancer pain: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.

Authors:  Senthil P Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2011-01

8.  Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society.

Authors:  Dwight Moulin; Aline Boulanger; A J Clark; Hance Clarke; Thuan Dao; G A Finley; Andrea Furlan; Ian Gilron; Allan Gordon; Patricia K Morley-Forster; Barry J Sessle; Pamela Squire; Jennifer Stinson; Paul Taenzer; Ana Velly; Mark A Ware; Erica L Weinberg; Owen D Williamson
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Can treatment success with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster be predicted in cancer pain with neuropathic components or trigeminal neuropathic pain?

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Kern; Srinivas Nalamachu; Louis Brasseur; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Frequent Occurrence of Pain and Prescription Opioid Use for Treatment of Pain Among Women with and at Risk for HIV Infection.

Authors:  Anjali Sharma; Donald R Hoover; Qiuhu Shi; Jennie C I Tsao; Christopher Cox; Deborah R Gustafson; Kathleen Weber; Ruth M Greenblatt; Bradley E Aouizerat; Michael W Plankey
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.