PURPOSE: The detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs) in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) remains a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT (FDG PET/CT with early and delayed imaging) in patients with symptomatic neurofibromas, to revalidate current cut-off values for identification of malignant change within neurofibromas and to examine the relationship between SUV and tumour grade. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic neurofibromas underwent FDG PET/CT imaging at 90 and 240 min. Semiquantitative analysis using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was performed and correlated with histology. RESULT: In 69 patients, 85 lesions were identified for analysis, including 10 atypical neurofibromas and 21 MPNSTs. Sensitivity of FDG PET/CT in diagnosing NF1-associated MPNST was 0.97 (95% CI 0.81-0.99) and the specificity was 0.87 (CI 0.74-0.95). There was a significant difference in SUVmax between early and delayed imaging and in SUVmax between tumours identified as benign and malignant on PET/CT. There was also a significant difference in SUVmax between tumour grades. CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is a highly sensitive and specific imaging modality for the diagnosis of MPNST in NF1 patients. We recommend performing early (90 min) and delayed imaging at 4 h for accurate lesion characterization and using a cut-off SUVmax of 3.5 on delayed imaging to achieve maximal sensitivity.
PURPOSE: The detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs) in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) remains a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT (FDG PET/CT with early and delayed imaging) in patients with symptomatic neurofibromas, to revalidate current cut-off values for identification of malignant change within neurofibromas and to examine the relationship between SUV and tumour grade. METHODS:Patients with symptomatic neurofibromas underwent FDG PET/CT imaging at 90 and 240 min. Semiquantitative analysis using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was performed and correlated with histology. RESULT: In 69 patients, 85 lesions were identified for analysis, including 10 atypical neurofibromas and 21 MPNSTs. Sensitivity of FDG PET/CT in diagnosing NF1-associated MPNST was 0.97 (95% CI 0.81-0.99) and the specificity was 0.87 (CI 0.74-0.95). There was a significant difference in SUVmax between early and delayed imaging and in SUVmax between tumours identified as benign and malignant on PET/CT. There was also a significant difference in SUVmax between tumour grades. CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is a highly sensitive and specific imaging modality for the diagnosis of MPNST in NF1patients. We recommend performing early (90 min) and delayed imaging at 4 h for accurate lesion characterization and using a cut-off SUVmax of 3.5 on delayed imaging to achieve maximal sensitivity.
Authors: R E Ferner; J D Lucas; M J O'Doherty; R A Hughes; M A Smith; B F Cronin; J Bingham Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: M Trojani; G Contesso; J M Coindre; J Rouesse; N B Bui; A de Mascarel; J F Goussot; M David; F Bonichon; C Lagarde Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1984-01-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: S Cardona; M Schwarzbach; Ulf Hinz; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; N Attigah; G Mechtersheimer section sign; T Lehnert Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: L Valeyrie-Allanore; N Ortonne; L Lantieri; S Ferkal; J Wechsler; M Bagot; P Wolkenstein Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Martin Torriani; Francis Hornicek; Hugue A Ouellette; William E Plamer; Ziv Williams; Allan J Fischman; Scott R Plotkin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: D Visvikis; D C Costa; I Croasdale; A H R Lonn; J Bomanji; S Gacinovic; P J Ell Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-12-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: J Uthoff; F A De Stefano; K Panzer; B W Darbro; T S Sato; R Khanna; D E Quelle; D K Meyerholz; J Weimer; J C Sieren Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: Christian Philipp Reinert; Martin Ulrich Schuhmann; Benjamin Bender; Isabel Gugel; Christian la Fougère; Jürgen Schäfer; Sergios Gatidis Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-12-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: P de Blank; K Cole; L Kersun; A Green; J J Wilkes; J Belasco; R Bagatell; L C Bailey; M J Fisher Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: L M Fayad; X Wang; J O Blakeley; D J Durand; M A Jacobs; S Demehri; T K Subhawong; T Soldatos; P B Barker Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Johannes Salamon; Simon Veldhoen; Ivayla Apostolova; Peter Bannas; Jin Yamamura; Jochen Herrmann; Reinhard E Friedrich; Gerhard Adam; Victor F Mautner; Thorsten Derlin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 5.315