AIMS: Benign neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST) commonly develop in patients with neurofibromatosis. Differentiation of benign from malignant tumours by conventional preoperative imaging is unreliable. FDG-PET is a non-invasive technique for biological tumour evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the value of FDG-PET in patients with neurogenic tumours suspicious for MPNST. METHODS: Benign and malignant neurogenic soft tissue tumours were prospectively evaluated by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Three-dimensional qualitative and quantitative FDG-PET was performed. Standard uptake value (SUV) was analyzed with respect to histological diagnosis and follow-up data. RESULTS: Twenty-five neurogenic soft tissue tumours were included. FDG-PET identified all primary (n=6) and recurrent MPNST (n=7). Benign lesions (n=12) did not demonstrate high FDG uptake. The SUV was significantly higher in MPNST (median 2.9; range 1.8-12.3), than in benign tumours (median 1.1; range 0.5-1.8) (p<0.001). At a cut-off value of 1.8 SUV measured 1 h post-injection FDG-PET distinguished between MPNST and benign neurogenic tumours with 100% sensitivity and 83% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET allows discrimination of benign from malignant neurogenic tumours. This should be particularly useful in patients with neurofibromatosis as FDG-PET may help to avoid multiple surgical procedures for benign tumours.
AIMS: Benign neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST) commonly develop in patients with neurofibromatosis. Differentiation of benign from malignant tumours by conventional preoperative imaging is unreliable. FDG-PET is a non-invasive technique for biological tumour evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the value of FDG-PET in patients with neurogenic tumours suspicious for MPNST. METHODS: Benign and malignant neurogenic soft tissue tumours were prospectively evaluated by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Three-dimensional qualitative and quantitative FDG-PET was performed. Standard uptake value (SUV) was analyzed with respect to histological diagnosis and follow-up data. RESULTS: Twenty-five neurogenic soft tissue tumours were included. FDG-PET identified all primary (n=6) and recurrent MPNST (n=7). Benign lesions (n=12) did not demonstrate high FDG uptake. The SUV was significantly higher in MPNST (median 2.9; range 1.8-12.3), than in benign tumours (median 1.1; range 0.5-1.8) (p<0.001). At a cut-off value of 1.8 SUV measured 1 h post-injection FDG-PET distinguished between MPNST and benign neurogenic tumours with 100% sensitivity and 83% specificity. CONCLUSIONS:FDG-PET allows discrimination of benign from malignant neurogenic tumours. This should be particularly useful in patients with neurofibromatosis as FDG-PET may help to avoid multiple surgical procedures for benign tumours.
Authors: P de Blank; K Cole; L Kersun; A Green; J J Wilkes; J Belasco; R Bagatell; L C Bailey; M J Fisher Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Victoria S Warbey; Rosalie E Ferner; Joel T Dunn; Eduardo Calonje; Michael J O'Doherty Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Matthias R Benz; Johannes Czernin; Sarah M Dry; William D Tap; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; David Elashoff; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber; Fritz C Eilber Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860