Literature DB >> 19141262

Current trends in coronary revascularization.

Shannon M Dunlay1, Charanjit S Rihal, Thoralf M Sundt, Yariv Gerber, Véronique L Roger.   

Abstract

The options for coronary revascularization broadened in recent years with the introduction of bare-metal stents in the 1990s and drug-eluting stents in 2003. Since then, the rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have increased whereas the use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has decreased. Although historically there have been disparities in the use of revascularization procedures in women, the elderly, and nonwhite patients, there is some evidence to suggest these gaps have narrowed in recent years. In any given clinical circumstance, there is ongoing debate as to whether PCI or CABG is the more appropriate revascularization method depending on coronary anatomy, ventricular function, and associated conditions. Also, trends in coronary revascularization are potentially influenced by emerging clinical evidence and new technologies, national guidelines and appropriateness criteria, procedure reimbursement, and changes in the population being treated. Accordingly, it is unclear whether the trend in increased use of PCI versus CABG will continue.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19141262     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-009-0007-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  49 in total

1.  Analysis of trends in coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention rates in Washington state from 1987 to 2001.

Authors:  Matthew R Ulrich; Douglas M Brock; Andrew A Ziskind
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Coronary artery bypass grafting in DES era.

Authors:  Tadashi Tashiro; Noritsugu Morishige; Hidehiko Iwahashi; Yoshio Hayashida; Kazuma Takeuchi; Nobuhisa Ito
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study.

Authors:  D van Dijk; A P Nierich; E W Jansen; H M Nathoe; W J Suyker; J C Diephuis; W J van Boven; C Borst; E Buskens; D E Grobbee; E O Robles De Medina; P P de Jaegere
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Sex and classic risk factors after myocardial infarction: a community study.

Authors:  Yariv Gerber; Susan A Weston; Jill M Killian; Steven J Jacobsen; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Racial trends in the use of major procedures among the elderly.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Elliott S Fisher; Zhonghe Li; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery trends in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  D P Weerasinghe; H D Wolfenden; F Yusuf
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.427

7.  Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Amir Lerman; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.

Authors:  William A Ghali; Hude Quan; Fiona M Shrive; Gregory M Hirsch
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Gender-related changes in the practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in Northern New England from 1994 to 1999.

Authors:  David J Malenka; David E Wennberg; Hebe A Quinton; Daniel J O'Rourke; Paul D McGrath; Samuel J Shubrooks; Gerry T O'Connor; Thomas J Ryan; John F Robb; Mirle A Kellett; William A Bradley; Michael A Hearne; Peter N VerLee; Matthew W Watkins; Bruce D Hettleman; Winthrop D Piper
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000.

Authors:  Earl S Ford; Umed A Ajani; Janet B Croft; Julia A Critchley; Darwin R Labarthe; Thomas E Kottke; Wayne H Giles; Simon Capewell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Daniel Polsky; Feifei Yang; Lin Yang; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict 30-day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients.

Authors:  Karl E Minges; Jeph Herrin; Paul N Fiorilli; Jeptha P Curtis
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.

Authors:  Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Wilbert S Aronow; Marjan Mujib; Chandrasekar Palaniswamy; Sachin Sule; Diwakar Jain; William Gotsis; Ali Ahmed; William H Frishman; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.