Literature DB >> 12505219

Gender-related changes in the practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in Northern New England from 1994 to 1999.

David J Malenka1, David E Wennberg, Hebe A Quinton, Daniel J O'Rourke, Paul D McGrath, Samuel J Shubrooks, Gerry T O'Connor, Thomas J Ryan, John F Robb, Mirle A Kellett, William A Bradley, Michael A Hearne, Peter N VerLee, Matthew W Watkins, Bruce D Hettleman, Winthrop D Piper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the changing practice of interventional cardiology has been associated with improved outcomes for women, and how these outcomes compare with those for men.
BACKGROUND: Previous work from the early 1990s suggested women are at a higher risk than men for adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). From 1994 to 1999 data were collected on 33,666 consecutive hospital admissions for a PCI in Northern New England. Multivariate models were used to adjust for differences in case-mix across year of procedure when comparing outcomes. Direct standardization was used to calculate adjusted rates.
RESULTS: From 1994 to 1999, the case-mix worsened for both women and men, although women had more co-morbidities than did men throughout the period. Stent use increased over time (>75% in 1999). Concomitantly, the need for emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) decreased significantly (p(trend) < or = 0.001; in 1999: 0.06% for women, 0.05% for men). Although the emergency CABG rates were higher for women at the beginning of the study, by the end, they were comparable (adjusted odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 2.38, p = 0.315). The myocardial infarction (MI) rates decreased over time for both women (by 29.7%, p(trend) = 0.378) and men (by 37.6%, p(trend) = 0.009) and did not differ by gender. The mortality rates did not decrease significantly over time and were not significantly different between the genders (mean 1.21% for women, 1.06% for men; p = 0.096).
CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent with the changing practice of PCI, and despite treating sicker patients, there have been important improvements in post-PCI CABG and MI rates for women, as well as for men. Unlike in earlier years, there are no longer significant differences in outcomes by gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12505219     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02605-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

1.  Sex in the CCU: women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome may do no worse despite less intervention.

Authors:  Pamela J Bradshaw; Peter L Thompson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Economic evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stents.

Authors:  Fiona M Shrive; Braden J Manns; P Diane Galbraith; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Referrals in acute coronary events for CARdiac catheterization: The RACE CAR trial.

Authors:  Catherine Kreatsoulas; Debi Sloane; Janice Pogue; James L Velianou; Sonia S Anand
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Kaberi Dasgupta; Veena Guru; Karin H Humphries; Jennifer McGrath; Colleen Norris; Doreen Rabi; Johanne Tremblay; Arsham Alamian; Tracie Barnett; Jafna Cox; William Amin Ghali; Sherry Grace; Pavel Hamet; Teresa Ho; Susan Kirkland; Marie Lambert; Danielle Libersan; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Milan Petrovich; Vicky Tagalakis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Coronary revascularisation in women.

Authors:  G W Mikhail
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Current trends in coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Charanjit S Rihal; Thoralf M Sundt; Yariv Gerber; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02

7.  In-hospital complications after invasive strategy for the management of Non STEMI: women fare as well as men.

Authors:  Caroline Berthillot; Dominique Stephan; Michel Chauvin; Gerald Roul
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Amir Lerman; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Sex-related differences in fractional flow reserve-guided treatment.

Authors:  Jing Li; Charanjit S Rihal; Yoshiki Matsuo; Muhamad Y Elrashidi; Andreas J Flammer; Moo-Sik Lee; Andrew Cassar; Ryan J Lennon; Joerg Herrmann; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; John F Bresnahan; Qi Hua; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 6.546

10.  Gender differences in management and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results on 20,290 patients from the AMIS Plus Registry.

Authors:  Dragana Radovanovic; Paul Erne; Philip Urban; Osmund Bertel; Hans Rickli; Jean-Michel Gaspoz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.