Literature DB >> 19140192

Evaluation of glycemic control following discontinuation of an intensive insulin protocol.

Quinn A Czosnowski1, Joseph M Swanson, Bob L Lobo, Joyce E Broyles, Paul R Deaton, Christopher K Finch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive insulin protocols (IIPs) have been demonstrated to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Currently, there are no published studies evaluating glycemic control after discontinuation of an IIP.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare blood glucose (BG) control during an IIP and for 5 days following its discontinuation (follow-up period).
METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of intensive care unit patients who received an IIP for >or=24 hours. Data were collected during the last 12 hours of the IIP and subsequent follow-up period.
RESULTS: For all 65 included patients, the mean +/- standard deviation for BG on the IIP was 123 +/- 26 mg/dL versus 168 +/- 50 mg/dL following discontinuation of the IIP (P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) insulin that was administered decreased from 40 (22-65) units on the IIP to 8 (0-18) units after the IIP was stopped (P < 0.001). The mean daily BG during the follow-up period was significantly higher than that during the IIP (P < 0.001). Additionally, an insulin requirement of >20 units during the last 12 hours of the IIP was identified as a risk factor for poor glycemic control during the follow-up period (odds ratio: 4.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.17-18.17).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant increase in BG following discontinuation of an IIP. Higher insulin requirements during the last 12 hours of an IIP were identified as an independent risk factor for poor glycemic control following the IIP. A standardized insulin transition protocol may help better control BG after discontinuation of an IIP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19140192     DOI: 10.1002/jhm.393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  7 in total

Review 1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Effect of the Concomitant Use of Subcutaneous Basal Insulin and Intravenous Insulin Infusion in the Treatment of Severe Hyperglycemic Patients.

Authors:  Yejee Lim; Jung Hun Ohn; Joo Jeong; Jiwon Ryu; Sun-Wook Kim; Jae Ho Cho; Hee-Sun Park; Hye Won Kim; Jongchan Lee; Eun Sun Kim; Nak-Hyun Kim; You Hwan Jo; Hak Chul Jang
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Transition from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin: effectiveness and safety of a standardized protocol and predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Fausto Avanzini; Giuseppe Marelli; Walter Donzelli; Giovanna Busi; Stefania Carbone; Laura Bellato; Elena Lucia Colombo; Roberto Foschi; Emma Riva; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Mario De Martini
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Differences in hospital glycemic control and insulin requirements in patients recovering from critical illness and those without prior critical illness.

Authors:  April D Miller; Leslie M Phillips; Richard M Schulz; P Brandon Bookstaver; Celeste N Rudisill
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-24

Review 7.  Review of Evidence for Adult Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management Protocols.

Authors:  Tara T T Tran; Anthony Pease; Anna J Wood; Jeffrey D Zajac; Johan Mårtensson; Rinaldo Bellomo; Elif I I Ekinci
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.