PURPOSE: Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) has increased tremendously during the past decade. Recent changes in the DTCA environment may have affected its impact on clinical encounters. Our objective was to determine the rate of patient medication inquiries and their influence on clinical encounters in primary care. METHODS: Our methods consisted of a cross-sectional survey in the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners, a collaboration of 3 practice-based research networks. Clinicians completed a short patient encounter form after consecutive patient encounter for one-half or 1 full day. The main outcomes were the rate of inquiries, independent predictors of inquiries, and overall impact on clinical encounters. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight clinicians in 22 practices completed forms after 1,647 patient encounters. In 58 encounters (3.5%), the patient inquired about a specific new prescription medication. Community health center patients made fewer inquiries than private practice patients (1.7% vs 7.2%, P<.001). Predictors of inquiries included taking 3 or more chronic medications and the clinician being female. Most clinicians reported the requested medication was not their first choice for treatment (62%), but it was prescribed in 53% of the cases. Physicians interpreted the overall impact on the visit as positive in 24% of visits, neutral in 66%, and negative in 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Patient requests for prescription medication were uncommon overall, and even more so among patients in lower income groups. These requests were rarely perceived by clinicians as having a negative impact on the encounter. Future mixed methods studies should explore specific socioeconomic groups and reasons for clinicians' willingness to prescribe these medications.
PURPOSE: Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) has increased tremendously during the past decade. Recent changes in the DTCA environment may have affected its impact on clinical encounters. Our objective was to determine the rate of patient medication inquiries and their influence on clinical encounters in primary care. METHODS: Our methods consisted of a cross-sectional survey in the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners, a collaboration of 3 practice-based research networks. Clinicians completed a short patient encounter form after consecutive patient encounter for one-half or 1 full day. The main outcomes were the rate of inquiries, independent predictors of inquiries, and overall impact on clinical encounters. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight clinicians in 22 practices completed forms after 1,647 patient encounters. In 58 encounters (3.5%), the patient inquired about a specific new prescription medication. Community health center patients made fewer inquiries than private practice patients (1.7% vs 7.2%, P<.001). Predictors of inquiries included taking 3 or more chronic medications and the clinician being female. Most clinicians reported the requested medication was not their first choice for treatment (62%), but it was prescribed in 53% of the cases. Physicians interpreted the overall impact on the visit as positive in 24% of visits, neutral in 66%, and negative in 10%. CONCLUSIONS:Patient requests for prescription medication were uncommon overall, and even more so among patients in lower income groups. These requests were rarely perceived by clinicians as having a negative impact on the encounter. Future mixed methods studies should explore specific socioeconomic groups and reasons for clinicians' willingness to prescribe these medications.
Authors: W David Bradford; Andrew N Kleit; Paul J Nietert; Terrence Steyer; Thomas McIlwain; Steven Ornstein Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Michele M Spence; Stephanie S Teleki; T Craig Cheetham; Stuart O Schweitzer; Mirta Millares Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Peter C Smith; Rodrigo Araya-Guerra; Caroline Bublitz; Bennett Parnes; L Miriam Dickinson; Rebecca Van Vorst; John M Westfall; Wilson D Pace Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-02-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bennett Parnes; Linda Niebauer; Sherry Holcomb; Miriam Dickinson; Jack Westfall; Becky Vanvorst; Wilson Pace Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Bennett L Parnes; Deborah S Main; L Miriam Dickinson; Linda Niebauer; Sherry Holcomb; John M Westfall; Wilson D Pace Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Barbara Mintzes; Morris L Barer; Richard L Kravitz; Ken Bassett; Joel Lexchin; Arminée Kazanjian; Robert G Evans; Richard Pan; Stephen A Marion Journal: CMAJ Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jessica T DeFrank; Nancy D Berkman; Leila Kahwati; Katherine Cullen; Kathryn J Aikin; Helen W Sullivan Journal: Health Commun Date: 2019-04-11
Authors: John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Elizabeth W Staton; Bennett Parnes; Peter C Smith; Linda J Niebauer; Douglas H Fernald; Javan Quintela; Rebecca F Van Vorst; L Miriam Dickinson; Wilson D Pace Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Spencer D Dorn; Joel F Farley; Richard A Hansen; Nilay D Shah; Robert S Sandler Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-05-13 Impact factor: 22.682