Literature DB >> 19138531

A literature review of organisational, individual and teamwork factors contributing to the ICU discharge process.

Frances Lin1, Wendy Chaboyer, Marianne Wallis.   

Abstract

AIM: It is everyday news that we need more intensive care unit (ICU) beds, thus effective use of existing resources is imperative. The aim of this literature review was to critically analyse current literature on how organizational factors, individual factors and teamwork factors influence the ICU discharge process. A better understanding of discharge practices has the potential to ultimately influence ICU resource availability.
METHODS: Databases including CINAHL, MEDLINE, PROQUEST, SCIENCE DIRECT were searched using key terms such as ICU discharge, discharge process, ICU guidelines and policies, discharge decision-making, ICU organisational factors, ICU and human factors, and ICU patient transfer. Articles' reference lists were also used to locate relevant literature. A total of 21 articles were included in the review.
RESULTS: Only a small number of ICUs used written patient discharge guidelines. Consensus, rather than empirical evidence, dictates the importance of guidelines and policies. Premature discharge, discharge after hours and discharge by triage still exist due to resources constraints, even though the literature suggests these are associated with increased mortality. Teamwork and team training appear to be effective in improving efficiency and communication between professions or between clinical areas. However, this aspect has rarely been researched in relation to ICU patient discharge.
CONCLUSION: Intensive care patient discharge is influenced by organisational factors, individual factors and teamwork factors. Organisational interventions are effective in reducing ICU discharge delay and shortening patient hospital stay. More rigorous research is needed to discover how these factors influence the ICU discharge process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19138531     DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2008.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Crit Care        ISSN: 1036-7314            Impact factor:   2.737


  23 in total

Review 1.  Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.

Authors:  F M Hajjaj; M S Salek; M K A Basra; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Optimal control of ICU patient discharge: from theory to implementation.

Authors:  Fermín Mallor; Cristina Azcárate; Julio Barado
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-03-13

3.  Structured handoff checklists improve clinical measures in patients discharged from the neurointensive care unit.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Coon; Neha M Kramer; Rachel R Fabris; David B Burkholder; James P Klaas; Jonathan Graff-Radford; S Arthur Moore; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Jeffrey W Britton; Lyell K Jones
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2015-02

4.  Decreasing patient length of stay via new flexible exam room allocation policies in ambulatory care clinics.

Authors:  Vahab Vahdat; Jacqueline Griffin; James E Stahl
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-08-09

5.  Struggle with a gap between intensive care units and general wards.

Authors:  Marie Häggström; Kenneth Asplund; Lisbeth Kristiansen
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2009-09-01

6.  The use of a standardized PCT-algorithm reduces costs in intensive care in septic patients - a DRG-based simulation model.

Authors:  M H Wilke; R F Grube; K F Bodmann
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 7.  Improving clinical handover between intensive care unit and general ward professionals at intensive care unit discharge.

Authors:  Nelleke van Sluisveld; Gijs Hesselink; Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven; Gert Westert; Hub Wollersheim; Marieke Zegers
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Development and implementation of a risk identification tool to facilitate critical care transitions for high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hoffman; Jason Saucier; Serena Dasani; Tara Collins; Daniel N Holena; Meghan Fitzpatrick; Boris Tsypenyuk; Niels D Martin
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Henry T Stelfox; Laure Perrier; Sharon E Straus; William A Ghali; David Zygun; Paul Boiteau; Danny J Zuege
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A strategy to enhance the safety and efficiency of handovers of ICU patients: study protocol of the pICUp study.

Authors:  Nelleke van Sluisveld; Marieke Zegers; Gert Westert; Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven; Hub Wollersheim
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.