Literature DB >> 19138309

Multinational trials-recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: the ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Diane Wild1, Sonya Eremenco, Isabelle Mear, Mona Martin, Caroline Houchin, Mary Gawlicki, Asha Hareendran, Ingela Wiklund, Lee Yee Chong, Robyn von Maltzahn, Lawrence Cohen, Elizabeth Molsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With the internationalization of clinical trial programs, there is an increased need to translate and culturally adapt patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Although guidelines for good practices in translation and linguistic validation are available, the ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Task Force identified a number of areas where they felt that further discussion around methods and best practices would be beneficial. The areas identified by the team were as follows: 1) the selection of the languages required for multinational trials; 2) the approaches suggested when the same language is required across two or more countries; and 3) the assessment of measurement equivalence to support the aggregation of data from different countries.
METHODS: The task force addressed these three areas, reviewed the available literature, and had multiple discussions to develop this report.
RESULTS: Decision aid tools have also been developed and presented for the selection of languages and the approaches suggested for the use of the same language in different countries.
CONCLUSION: It is hoped that this report and the decision tools proposed will assist those involved with multinational trials to 1) decide on the translations required for each country; 2) choose the approach to use when the same language is spoken in more than one country; and 3) choose methods to gather evidence to support the pooling of data collected using different language versions of the same tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19138309     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  87 in total

Review 1.  Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care.

Authors:  Charis Wei Ling Ng; Kok Ping Ng
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Combining online and in-person methods to evaluate the content validity of PROMIS fatigue short forms in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S J Bartlett; A K Gutierrez; A Butanis; V P Bykerk; J R Curtis; S Ginsberg; A L Leong; A Lyddiatt; W B Nowell; A M Orbai; K C Smith; C O Bingham
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach.

Authors:  San Keller; Sydney Dy; Renee Wilson; Vadim Dukhanin; Claire Snyder; Albert Wu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Commentary: the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS®) for children and youth: application to pediatric psychology.

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest; Katherine B Bevans; Carole Tucker; Anne W Riley; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; William Gardner; Kathleen Pajer
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2012-02-23

Review 5.  ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Albert W Wu; Galina Velikova; Caroline B Terwee; Claire F Snyder; Carolyn Schwartz; Dennis A Revicki; Carol M Moinpour; Lori D McLeod; Jessica C Lyons; William R Lenderking; Pamela S Hinds; Ron D Hays; Joanne Greenhalgh; Richard Gershon; David Feeny; Peter M Fayers; David Cella; Michael Brundage; Sara Ahmed; Neil K Aaronson; Zeeshan Butt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Self-reported pediatric measures of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and strength impact for PROMIS: item development.

Authors:  Carole A Tucker; Katherine B Bevans; Rachel E Teneralli; Ashley Wilder Smith; Heather R Bowles; Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.049

7.  Pooling of cross-cultural PRO data in multinational clinical trials: how much can poor measurement affect statistical power?

Authors:  Antoine Regnault; Jean-François Hamel; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Spanish translation and linguistic validation of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) measurement system.

Authors:  H Correia; B Pérez; B Arnold; Alex W K Wong; J S Lai; M Kallen; D Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments.

Authors:  Antoine Regnault; Michael Herdman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Subjective well-being measures for children were developed within the PROMIS project: presentation of first results.

Authors:  Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; Janine Devine; Katherine Bevans; Anne W Riley; Jeanhee Moon; John M Salsman; Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.