Literature DB >> 32495096

Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach.

San Keller1, Sydney Dy2,3, Renee Wilson2, Vadim Dukhanin2, Claire Snyder2,3, Albert Wu2,3.   

Abstract

New models of primary care include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote patient-centered care. PROMs provide information on patient functional status and well-being, can be used to enhance care quality, and are proposed for use in assessing performance. Our objective was to identify a short list of candidate PROMs for use in primary care practice and to serve as a basis for performance measures (PMs). We used qualitative and quantitative methods to identify relevant patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains for use in performance measurement (PRO-PM) and their associated PROMs. We collected data from key informant groups: patients (n = 13; one-on-one and group interviews; concept saturation analysis), clinical thought leaders (n = 9; group discussions; thematic analysis), primary care practices representatives (n = 37; six focus groups; thematic analysis), and primary care payer representatives (n = 10; 12-question survey; frequencies of responses). We merged the key informant group information with findings from environmental literature scans. We conducted a targeted evidence review of measurement properties for candidate PROMs. We used a scoping review and key informant groups to identify PROM evaluation criteria, which were linked to the National Quality Forum measure evaluation criteria. We developed a de novo schema to score candidate PROMs against our criteria. We identified four PRO domains and 10 candidate PROMs: 3 for depressive symptoms, 2 for physical function, 3 for self-efficacy, 2 for ability to participate. Five PROMs met ≥ 70% of the evidence criteria for three PRO domains: PHQ-9 or PROMIS Depression (depression), PF-10 or PROMIS-PF (physical functioning), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Treatments and Medications (self-efficacy). The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities met 68% of our criteria and might be considered for inclusion. Existing evidence and key informant data identified 5 candidate PROMs to use in primary care. These instruments can be used to develop PRO-PMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCCs; PRO-PM; PROM; multiple chronic conditions; patient-centered care; patient-reported outcome measures; performance measurement; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32495096      PMCID: PMC7459066          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05811-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  89 in total

Review 1.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Readability and Comprehension of the Geriatric Depression Scale and PROMIS® Physical Function Items in Older African Americans and Latinos.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Loretta Jones; José L Calderón; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The possibilities of patient-centered medicine.

Authors:  E Balint
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1969-05

Review 4.  Twelve evidence-based principles for implementing self-management support in primary care.

Authors:  Malcolm Battersby; Michael Von Korff; Judith Schaefer; Connie Davis; Evette Ludman; Sarah M Greene; Melissa Parkerton; Edward H Wagner
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-12

5.  Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions.

Authors:  Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Craig Velozo; Sergio Romero; Lisa M Shulman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  The psychometric properties of depression screening tools in primary healthcare settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarira El-Den; Timothy F Chen; Yuh-Lin Gan; Eling Wong; Claire L O'Reilly
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Validation of the depression item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in a three-month observational study.

Authors:  Paul A Pilkonis; Lan Yu; Nathan E Dodds; Kelly L Johnston; Catherine C Maihoefer; Suzanne M Lawrence
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 8.  Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.

Authors:  Margaret Rothman; Laurie Burke; Pennifer Erickson; Nancy Kline Leidy; Donald L Patrick; Charles D Petrie
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary health care.

Authors:  Martin Fortin; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Tarek Bouhali; Marie-France Dubois; Cynthia Gagnon; Martin Bélanger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Using PROMIS for measuring recovery after abdominal surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Eva van der Meij; Johannes R Anema; Judith A F Huirne; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using a patient-reported outcome to improve detection of cognitive impairment and dementia: The patient version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).

Authors:  James E Galvin; Magdalena I Tolea; Stephanie Chrisphonte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.