Literature DB >> 19137230

The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study.

Simon Barr1, Fiona M Reid, Carolyn E North, Gordon Hosker, Anthony R B Smith.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to provide long-term outcome data, at least 10 years, following laparoscopic colposuspension.
METHODS: The study includes a control group who underwent open colposuspension. A consecutive series of 139 women who had undergone laparoscopic colposuspension were reviewed and compared to 52 women who had an open colposuspension in the same unit. Subjects were contacted by telephone, at least 10 years post-operatively, at which time a structured interview was performed which included the short-form Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom questionnaire.
RESULTS: There was deterioration in subjective cure rates from 71% and 67% at 6 months to 52% and 36% at 10 years for the laparoscopic and open procedures, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that laparoscopic colposuspension is probably as durable as open colposuspension. However, cure rates for both procedures appear to deteriorate over time, emphasising the importance of long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19137230     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0798-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  7 in total

1.  Trials of surgery for stress incontinence--thoughts on the 'Humpty Dumpty principle'.

Authors:  Paul Hilton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Long-term follow-up studies in pelvic floor dysfunction: the Holy Grail or a realistic aim?

Authors:  P Hilton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up.

Authors:  M Alcalay; A Monga; S L Stanton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-09

4.  Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  H C Kitchener; G Dunn; V Lawton; F Reid; L Nelson; A R B Smith
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M P Carey; J T Goh; A Rosamilia; A Cornish; I Gordon; G Hawthorne; C F Maher; P L Dwyer; P Moran; D T Gilmour
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Preben Kjølhede
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up.

Authors:  K L Ward; P Hilton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 6.531

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  TVT versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A Valpas; S Ala-Nissilä; E Tomas; C G Nilsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Jawad Freites; Fiona Stewart; Muhammad Imran Omar; Atefeh Mashayekhi; Wael I Agur
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.