Literature DB >> 16956331

Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.

M P Carey1, J T Goh, A Rosamilia, A Cornish, I Gordon, G Hawthorne, C F Maher, P L Dwyer, P Moran, D T Gilmour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative characteristics, short-term, and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) and open Burch colposuspension (OBC) for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence.
DESIGN: Randomised surgical trial with single blinding.
SETTING: Three tertiary level teaching hospitals involving seven surgeons of varying skill levels. POPULATION: Two hundred women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).
METHODS: The two groups were treated in identical fashion, except for the laparoscopic or open approach to surgery. Attempts were made to blind the subjects and the observers obtaining outcome data to treatment group. Analyses were adjusted for surgeon experience. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absence of USI 6 months following surgery, postoperative pain, time spent in hospital, and time to return to activities of normal daily living.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in objective and subjective measures of cure and in patient satisfaction at 6 months, 24 months, or 3-5 years of follow up between laparoscopic and open colposuspension groups. Laparoscopic colposuspension took longer time to perform (87 versus 42 minutes, P< 0.0001) but was associated with less blood loss (P = 0.03), less pain (P = 0.02), and quicker return to normal activities (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: LBC has significant advantages over traditional OBC, without any apparent compromise in short-term and long-term outcomes. To compare perioperative characteristics, short-term, and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) and open Burch colposuspension (OBC) for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Randomised surgical trial with single blinding. Three tertiary level teaching hospitals involving seven surgeons of varying skill levels. Two hundred women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). The two groups were treated in identical fashion, except for the laparoscopic or open approach to surgery. Attempts were made to blind the subjects and the observers obtaining outcome data to treatment group. Analyses were adjusted for surgeon experience. Absence of USI 6 months following surgery, postoperative pain, time spent in hospital, and time to return to activities of normal daily living. There were no significant differences in objective and subjective measures of cure and in patient satisfaction at 6 months, 24 months, or 3-5 years of follow up between laparoscopic and open colposuspension groups. Laparoscopic colposuspension took longer time to perform (87 versus 42 minutes, P < 0.0001) but was associated with less blood loss (P= 0.03), less pain (P= 0.02), and quicker return to normal activities (P= 0.01). LBC has significant advantages over traditional OBC, without any apparent compromise in short-term and long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16956331     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  11 in total

1.  The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study.

Authors:  Simon Barr; Fiona M Reid; Carolyn E North; Gordon Hosker; Anthony R B Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-01-10

2.  Primary stress urinary incontinence: what to do and why.

Authors:  Jhansi Reddy; Marie Fidela R Paraiso
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Marie Carmela M Lapitan; June D Cody; Atefeh Mashayekhi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 4.  Stress incontinence.

Authors:  Joseph Loze Onwude
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-04-14

5.  Functional Outcomes for Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery.

Authors:  Saya Segal; Lily A Arya; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2012-09

6.  Open and Laparoscopic Colposuspension in Girls with Refractory Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Barbara Anna Dobrowolska-Glazar; Luitzen A Groen; Anka J Nieuwhof-Leppink; Aart J Klijn; Tom P V M de Jong; Rafal Chrzan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Hong; Myung-Soo Choo; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Jawad Freites; Fiona Stewart; Muhammad Imran Omar; Atefeh Mashayekhi; Wael I Agur
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-10

9.  Retraction Note: Stress urinary incontinence: long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.

Authors:  Domenico Prezioso; Fabrizio Iacono; Giovanni Di Lauro; Ester Illiano; Giuseppe Romeo; Antonio Ruffo; Nicola Russo; Bruno Amato
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  The Effect of Stress Incontinence Operations on Sexual Functions: Laparoscopic Burch versus Transvaginal Tape-O.

Authors:  İlknur Gümüş; Muberra Namli Kalem; Ziya Kalem; Onder Surgit; Aydın Köşüş
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2018-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.