Literature DB >> 19136479

Infertility patients' beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences.

V Provoost1, G Pennings, P De Sutter, J Gerris, A Van de Velde, E De Lissnyder, M Dhont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little research has been done on how beliefs of infertility patients about their embryos are related to their disposition decisions. The objective of this study was to describe how patients speak about their embryos, in moral (e.g. status) and non-moral terms, and to investigate how patients' narratives are related to their disposition preferences.
METHODS: In-depth interviews based on the method of interpretative phenomenological analysis were conducted with patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment between May and July 2006.
RESULTS: Seven couples and 11 female patients were interviewed. Six major themes emerged from the narratives of the participants when they spoke about their embryos: (i) a medical-technical perspective; (ii) feelings; (iii) genetic link to oneself and/or one's partner; (iv) symbolic meaning of the relationship between the infertile partners; (v) moral status and (vi) instrumental value. All but two participants spontaneously considered the embryo disposition options as a two-stage decision sequence. In the first step, they considered donation to another couple for reproductive purposes. At this stage, the presence of the themes 'genetic link' and 'symbol of the relationship' was linked with a clear reluctance to donate. In the second step of the decision-making process, the option of donation for research and discarding were considered. At this stage, participants' confidence in medical science and the instrumental value they attached to the embryo were related to their decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' conceptualization of their embryos plays an important role in embryo disposition decisions. Our research showed that patients deal with these decisions in a two-stage decision sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19136479     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Discarding IVF embryos: reporting on global practices.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Giannelou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Tsioulou; S Grigoriadis; E Simopoulos; D Mantas; M Lambropoulou; M Koutsilieris; K Pantos; J C Harper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The decision-making process for the fate of frozen embryos by Japanese infertile women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shizuko Takahashi; Misao Fujita; Akihisa Fujimoto; Toshihiro Fujiwara; Tetsu Yano; Osamu Tsutsumi; Yuji Taketani; Akira Akabayashi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  A patient-centred approach to embryo donation for research.

Authors:  Catarina Samorinha; Susana Silva
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-11-07

4.  Patients' attitudes towards the surplus frozen embryos in China.

Authors:  Xuan Jin; GongXian Wang; SiSun Liu; Ming Liu; Jing Zhang; YuFa Shi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M).

Authors:  J Zhang; L R Rubin; H Zierhut; L M Pastore
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Attitudes towards embryo donation in Swedish women and men of reproductive age.

Authors:  Kjell Wånggren; Frida Prag; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.384

7.  Donation of surplus frozen pre-embryos to research in Israel: underlying motivations.

Authors:  Aviad Raz; Jonia Amer-Alshiek; Mor Goren-Margalit; Gal Jacobi; Alyssa Hochberg; Ami Amit; Foad Azem; Hadar Amir
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2016-11-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.