PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia is a well-known therapeutic problem; however, a lack of methods for repeated measurements of glioma partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) limits the ability to optimize the therapeutic approaches. We report the effects of 9.3 Gy of radiation and carbogen inhalation on orthotopic 9L and C6 gliomas and on the contralateral brain pO(2) in rats using a new and potentially widely useful method, multisite in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intracerebral 9L and C6 tumors were established in the left hemisphere of syngeneic rats, and electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry was successfully used for repeated tissue pO(2) measurements after 9.3 Gy of radiation and during carbogen breathing for 5 consecutive days. RESULTS: Intracerebral 9L gliomas had a pO(2) of 30-32 mm Hg and C6 gliomas were relatively hypoxic, with a pO(2) of 12-14 mm Hg (p < 0.05). The tissue pO(2) of the contralateral brain was 40-45 mm Hg in rats with either 9L or C6 gliomas. Irradiation resulted in a significant increase in pO(2) of the 9L gliomas only. A significant increase in the pO(2) of the 9L and C6 gliomas was observed in rats breathing carbogen, but this effect decreased during 5 days of repeated experiments in the 9L gliomas. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the tumor-specific effect of radiation (9.3.Gy) on tissue pO(2) and the different responses to carbogen inhalation. The ability of electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry to provide direct repeated measurements of tissue pO(2) could have a vital role in understanding the dynamics of hypoxia during therapy that could then be optimized by scheduling doses at times of improved tumor oxygenation.
PURPOSE:Tumor hypoxia is a well-known therapeutic problem; however, a lack of methods for repeated measurements of glioma partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) limits the ability to optimize the therapeutic approaches. We report the effects of 9.3 Gy of radiation and carbogen inhalation on orthotopic 9L and C6 gliomas and on the contralateral brain pO(2) in rats using a new and potentially widely useful method, multisite in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intracerebral 9L and C6 tumors were established in the left hemisphere of syngeneic rats, and electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry was successfully used for repeated tissue pO(2) measurements after 9.3 Gy of radiation and during carbogen breathing for 5 consecutive days. RESULTS: Intracerebral 9L gliomas had a pO(2) of 30-32 mm Hg and C6 gliomas were relatively hypoxic, with a pO(2) of 12-14 mm Hg (p < 0.05). The tissue pO(2) of the contralateral brain was 40-45 mm Hg in rats with either 9L or C6 gliomas. Irradiation resulted in a significant increase in pO(2) of the 9L gliomas only. A significant increase in the pO(2) of the 9L and C6 gliomas was observed in rats breathing carbogen, but this effect decreased during 5 days of repeated experiments in the 9L gliomas. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the tumor-specific effect of radiation (9.3.Gy) on tissue pO(2) and the different responses to carbogen inhalation. The ability of electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry to provide direct repeated measurements of tissue pO(2) could have a vital role in understanding the dynamics of hypoxia during therapy that could then be optimized by scheduling doses at times of improved tumor oxygenation.
Authors: James L Tatum; Gary J Kelloff; Robert J Gillies; Jeffrey M Arbeit; J Martin Brown; K S Clifford Chao; J Donald Chapman; William C Eckelman; Anthony W Fyles; Amato J Giaccia; Richard P Hill; Cameron J Koch; Murali Cherukuri Krishna; Kenneth A Krohn; Jason S Lewis; Ralph P Mason; Giovanni Melillo; Anwar R Padhani; Garth Powis; Joseph G Rajendran; Richard Reba; Simon P Robinson; Gregg L Semenza; Harold M Swartz; Peter Vaupel; David Yang; Barbara Croft; John Hoffman; Guoying Liu; Helen Stone; Daniel Sullivan Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: B D Ross; Y J Zhao; E R Neal; L D Stegman; M Ercolani; O Ben-Yoseph; T L Chenevert Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-06-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Julia A O'Hara; Huagang Hou; Eugene Demidenko; Roger J Springett; Nadeem Khan; Harold M Swartz Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2005-02-25 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Kristoffer Petersson; Leila Alikhani; Chakradhar Yakkala; Barrett D Allen; Jonathan Ollivier; Benoit Petit; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Amber R Syage; Thuan A Nguyen; Al Anoud D Baddour; Celine Lu; Paramvir Singh; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Jean-François Germond; Pascal Froidevaux; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles L Limoli Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nadeem Khan; Sriram P Mupparaju; Huagang Hou; Jean P Lariviere; Eugene Demidenko; Harold M Swartz; Alan Eastman Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Huagang Hou; Ruhong Dong; Hongbin Li; Benjamin Williams; Jean P Lariviere; S K Hekmatyar; Risto A Kauppinen; Nadeem Khan; Harold Swartz Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Nadeem Khan; Sriram Mupparaju; Shahryar K Hekmatyar; Huagang Hou; Jean P Lariviere; Eugene Demidenko; David J Gladstone; Risto A Kauppinen; Harold M Swartz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Martyna Elas; Jessica M Magwood; Brandi Butler; Chanel Li; Rona Wardak; Rebekah DeVries; Eugene D Barth; Boris Epel; Samuel Rubinstein; Charles A Pelizzari; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Howard J Halpern Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 12.701