Literature DB >> 19136094

Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology.

Massimo Candiani1, Stefano Izzo, Alessandro Bulfoni, Jennifer Riparini, Stefania Ronzoni, Annamaria Marconi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare length of stay, blood loss, operative time, and pain of laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled comparison between vaginal (VH) and laparoscopic (LH) hysterectomy among 60 consecutive patients with a uterine volume of 300 mL or less and without uterine prolapse. Patients were followed up for 12 months.
RESULTS: The groups were significantly different for mean operative time (VH: 81 +/- 30 minutes; LH: 99 +/- 25 minutes; P = .033) and blood loss (LH: 83 +/- 57 mL; VH: 178 +/- 149 mL; P = .004). Bilateral adnexectomy was performed when preoperatively planned in 73% of cases of the vaginal arm, whereas it was always performed in the laparoscopic arm (P = .045). Postoperative pain on day 0 and the number of days of analgesic request were higher in the vaginal group (P = .023 and P = .017, respectively). LH was associated with a reduced hospital stay (LH: 2.7 +/- 0.5 days; VH: 3.2 +/- 0.6 days; P < .001).There were no differences between the groups at the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less postoperative pain compared with vaginal hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19136094     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

Review 1.  Hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Eva van der Meij; Mark Hans Emanuel
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-12

Review 2.  Uterine fibroids and current clinical challenges.

Authors:  Salama S Salama; Gökhan S Kılıç
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-03-01

3.  The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Yong Wook Jung; Young Tae Kim; Dae Woo Lee; Yu Im Hwang; Eun Ji Nam; Jae Hoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  What's out there making us sick?

Authors:  Stephen J Genuis
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2011-10-24

5.  Ovarian cancer risk reduction through opportunistic salpingectomy.

Authors:  Janice S Kwon
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  A new approach to simplify surgical colpotomy in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  L van den Haak; J P T Rhemrev; M D Blikkendaal; A C M Luteijn; J J van den Dobbelsteen; S R C Driessen; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2016-01-12

7.  Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Lee; So Ra Oh; Yeon Jean Cho; Myoungseok Han; Jung-Woo Park; Su Jin Kim; Jeong Hye Yun; Sun Yi Choe; Joong Sub Choi; Jong Woon Bae
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Feasibility, Safety, and Satisfaction of Combined Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Chest Surgery in Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Individuals.

Authors:  Ilaria Mancini; Davide Tarditi; Giulia Gava; Stefania Alvisi; Luca Contu; Paolo Giovanni Morselli; Giulia Giacomelli; Alessandra Lami; Renato Seracchioli; Maria Cristina Meriggiola
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12

10.  Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Abraham R Shashoua; Diana Gill; Stephen R Locher
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.