Literature DB >> 19135922

Reduced compression mammography to reduce breast pain.

Koichi Chida1, Yuka Komatsu, Masahiro Sai, Asuka Nakagami, Takayuki Yamada, Takuya Yamashita, Issei Mori, Tadashi Ishibashi, Shin Maruoka, Masayuki Zuguchi.   

Abstract

This study evaluated whether reduced compression mammography to relieve breast tenderness is feasible. Women can better tolerate a compression force of approximately 90 N in mammography. The breast thickness increased approximately 3 mm when the compression force was reduced to 90 N, and although the radiation dose increased approximately 20%, the image quality was identical to that with standard compression. Many patients experience breast pain with a compression force of 120 N. Reduced compression force mammography is acceptable in women whose breasts are particularly sensitive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19135922     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  7 in total

1.  Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study.

Authors:  C E Mercer; P Hogg; R Lawson; J Diffey; E R E Denton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philippe Henrot; Martine Boisserie-Lacroix; Véronique Boute; Philippe Troufléau; Bruno Boyer; Grégory Lesanne; Véronique Gillon; Emmanuel Desandes; Edith Netter; Maryam Saadate; Anne Tardivon; Christine Grentzinger; Julia Salleron; Guillaume Oldrini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--an exploratory calibration study.

Authors:  P Hogg; M Taylor; K Szczepura; C Mercer; E Denton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Effects of Reduced Compression in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Pain, Anxiety, and Image Quality.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Abdullah Suhaimi; Afifah Mohamed; Mahadir Ahmad; Kanaga Kumari Chelliah
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11

5.  Contrast detail phantom comparison on a commercially available unit. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus full-field digital mammography (FFDM).

Authors:  Marco Bertolini; Andrea Nitrosi; Giovanni Borasi; Andrea Botti; Davide Tassoni; Roberto Sghedoni; Giulio Zuccoli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.

Authors:  Jerry E de Groot; Mireille J M Broeders; Cornelis A Grimbergen; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Mammographic compression in Asian women.

Authors:  Susie Lau; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.