Literature DB >> 1913498

The effect of silicone-gel-filled implants on mammography.

M J Silverstein1, N Handel, P Gamagami.   

Abstract

Fifty-four women who had previously undergone breast augmentation underwent film-screen mammography using both the standard implant compression technique and, when possible, the implant displacement technique. All had preaugmentation mammography available for evaluation. The area of mammographically visualized breast tissue before and after augmentation mammoplasty was measured using a transparent grid. Patients with subglandular implants had a mean 44% decrease of measurable tissue area with compression mammography and 36% decrease with displacement mammography. Patients with submuscular implants had a mean 25% decrease in measurable tissue area with compression mammography and 15% decrease with displacement mammography. Anterior breast tissue was seen better with displacement mammography, and posterior breast tissue was seen better with compression mammography. Most patients had some degree of parenchymal scarring and lower image quality after augmentation. State-of-the-art mammography was not possible in most patients whose breasts were augmented with silicone-gel-filled implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1913498     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910901)68:5+<1159::aid-cncr2820681306>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  [Plastic surgical body form correction. Part II: Face-lift, periorbital surgery, and breast augmentation and reduction].

Authors:  H Ryssel; G Germann; C Heitmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Aesthetic breast surgery: putting in context-a narrative review.

Authors:  Pankaj G Roy; Zhiyan Yan; Shashank Nigam; Kavish Maheshwari
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-09

3.  Complications and satisfaction in transwomen receiving breast augmentation: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  A K Schoffer; A K Bittner; J Hess; R Kimmig; O Hoffmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Breast augmentation.

Authors:  Sachin M Shridharani; Justin L Bellamy; Mark M Mofid; Navin K Singh
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-06-13

Review 5.  Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone

Authors:  Ernest Usang Ekpo; Maram Alakhras; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26

6.  The Impact of Implant Location on Breast Cancer Characteristics in Previously Augmented Patients: A Systematic Literature Analysis.

Authors:  Alain Joe Azzi; Jordan Gornitsky; Alex Viezel-Mathieu; Lucie Lessard
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.