Literature DB >> 19132235

Self-management of oral anticoagulation reduces major outcomes in the elderly. A randomized controlled trial.

Andrea Siebenhofer1, Ivo Rakovac, Caroline Kleespies, Brigitte Piso, Ulrike Didjurgeit.   

Abstract

Although many patients with long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) can manage their medication safely and reliably themselves, no study on elderly patients has as yet assessed the safety and efficacy of OAC self-management with major thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications as primary outcomes. In this multi-centre trial, patients aged 60 years or more were randomised into a self-management (SMG) (N = 99) or routine care group (RCG) (N = 96). The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of all thromboembolic events requiring hospitalisation and all major bleeding complications. Mean follow-up was 2.9 +/- 1.2 and 3.0 +/- 1.1 years in the SMG and RCG, respectively. In intention-to-treat analysis, 12 patients in the SMG versus 22 patients in the RCG reached a primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25 to 1.00; p = 0.049). The post-hoc analysis on OAC treatment sensitivity supported the benefit of self-management (HR 0.27; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.71; p = 0.006). Fifteen patients in the SMG died during the study, but none of the deaths was directly associated with anticoagulation therapy. In the RCG, 11 patients died; of those, three deaths were directly associated with anticoagulation therapy and there was one death of unknown cause. During follow-up, the quality of OAC control was significantly better in the SMG than in the RCG. In elderly patients, long-term self-management of oral anticoagulation is superior for the prevention of major thromboembolic and bleeding complications and for the quality of oral anticoagulation control compared to routine care for a mean follow-up period of three years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19132235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  18 in total

1.  An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; R Lynne Ruybalid; Lauren Uyeda; Robert G Edson; Ciaran Phibbs; Julia E Vertrees; Mei-Chiung Shih; Alan K Jacobson; David B Matchar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Point-of-care INR coagulometers for self-management of oral anticoagulation: primary care diagnostic technology update.

Authors:  Annette Plüddemann; Matthew Thompson; Jane Wolstenholme; Christopher P Price; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 4.  Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Carl J Heneghan; Josep M Garcia-Alamino; Elizabeth A Spencer; Alison M Ward; Rafael Perera; Clare Bankhead; Pablo Alonso-Coello; David Fitzmaurice; Kamal R Mahtani; Igho J Onakpoya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-05

Review 5.  Self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Andrea Siebenhofer; Klaus Jeitler; Karl Horvath; Wolfgang Habacher; Louise Schmidt; Thomas Semlitsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Measurement of warfarin in the oral fluid of patients undergoing anticoagulant oral therapy.

Authors:  Silvia Ghimenti; Tommaso Lomonaco; Massimo Onor; Laura Murgia; Aldo Paolicchi; Roger Fuoco; Lucia Ruocco; Giovanni Pellegrini; Maria Giovanna Trivella; Fabio Di Francesco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cohort study of Anticoagulation Self-Monitoring (CASM): a prospective study of its effectiveness in the community.

Authors:  Alison Ward; Alice Tompson; David Fitzmaurice; Stephen Sutton; Rafael Perera; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Is self-monitoring an effective option for people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy? A systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Pawana Sharma; Graham Scotland; Moira Cruickshank; Emma Tassie; Cynthia Fraser; Christopher Burton; Bernard Croal; Craig R Ramsay; Miriam Brazzelli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

10.  Primary care management for optimized antithrombotic treatment [PICANT]: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrea Siebenhofer; Lisa R Ulrich; Karola Mergenthal; Ina Roehl; Sandra Rauck; Andrea Berghold; Sebastian Harder; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Juliana J Petersen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.