Literature DB >> 19132141

Decision analysis for the evaluation of diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.

Andrew J Vickers1.   

Abstract

The traditional statistical approach to the evaluation of diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers is to assess their accuracy, using metrics such as sensitivity, specificity and the receiver-operating-characteristic curve. However, there is no obvious association between accuracy and clinical value: it is unclear, for example, just how accurate a test needs to be in order for it to be considered "accurate enough" to warrant its use in patient care. Decision analysis aims to assess the clinical value of a test by assigning weights to each possible consequence. These methods have been historically considered unattractive to the practicing biostatistician because additional data from the literature, or subjective assessments from individual patients or clinicians, are needed in order to assign weights appropriately. Decision analytic methods are available that can reduce these additional requirements. These methods can provide insight into the consequences of using a test, model or marker in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19132141      PMCID: PMC2614687          DOI: 10.1198/000313008X370302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  9 in total

Review 1.  The story of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  F H Schröder; L J Denis; M Roobol; V Nelen; A Auvinen; T Tammela; A Villers; X Rebillard; S Ciatto; M Zappa; A Berenguer; A Paez; J Hugosson; P Lodding; F Recker; M Kwiatkowski; W J Kirkels
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The threshold approach to clinical decision making.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Assessing the benefits of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes: a decision analysis.

Authors:  D A Berry; G Parmigiani
Journal:  Breast Dis       Date:  1998-04

4.  Validity of prognostic models: when is a model clinically useful?

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Ewout W Steyerberg; Marinus J C Eijkemans; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  2002-05

Review 5.  Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew W Roddam; Michael J Duffy; Freddie C Hamdy; Anthony Milford Ward; Julietta Patnick; Christopher P Price; Janet Rimmer; Cathie Sturgeon; Peter White; Naomi E Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Toward an optimal algorithm for ovarian cancer screening with longitudinal tumor markers.

Authors:  S J Skates; F J Xu; Y H Yu; K Sjövall; N Einhorn; Y Chang; R C Bast; R C Knapp
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Systematic review of statistical methods used in molecular marker studies in cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Kwang Jang; Daniel Sargent; Hans Lilja; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Systematic review: gene expression profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Luigi Marchionni; Renee F Wilson; Antonio C Wolff; Spyridon Marinopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Eric B Bass; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total
  45 in total

1.  Prostate cancer risk prediction in a urology clinic in Mexico.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Jamie C Messer; Christopher Louden; Miguel A Jimenez-Rios; Ian M Thompson; Hector R Camarena-Reynoso
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Everything you always wanted to know about evaluating prediction models (but were too afraid to ask).

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Predictive value of FRAX for fracture in obese older women.

Authors:  Melissa Premaor; Richard A Parker; Steve Cummings; Kris Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Li-Yung Lui; Theresa Hillier; Juliet Compston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ricardo Otazo; Daniel K Sodickson; Stella K Kang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Vardeman, S. B. and Morris, M. D. (2013), "Majority Voting by Independent Classifiers can Increase Error Rates," The American Statistician, 67, 94-96: Comment by Baker, Xu, Hu, and Huang and Reply.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Jian-Lun Xu; Ping Hu; Peng Huang
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 8.710

6.  New Prognostic Markers: The Pathway from Research to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Grand rounds Urol       Date:  2009-08

7.  A Highly Predictive Model for Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms Using Plasma MicroRNA: Improving Specificity and Sensitivity.

Authors:  Jane V Carter; Henry L Roberts; Jianmin Pan; Jonathan D Rice; James F Burton; Norman J Galbraith; Maurice R Eichenberger; Jeffery Jorden; Peter Deveaux; Russell Farmer; Anna Williford; Ziad Kanaan; Shesh N Rai; Susan Galandiuk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Urinary cell mRNA profiles and differential diagnosis of acute kidney graft dysfunction.

Authors:  Marie Matignon; Ruchuang Ding; Darshana M Dadhania; Franco B Mueller; Choli Hartono; Catherine Snopkowski; Carol Li; John R Lee; Daniel Sjoberg; Surya V Seshan; Vijay K Sharma; Hua Yang; Bakr Nour; Andrew J Vickers; Manikkam Suthanthiran; Thangamani Muthukumar
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 9.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Improvements in ability to detect undiagnosed diabetes by using information on family history among adults in the United States.

Authors:  Quanhe Yang; Tiebin Liu; Rodolfo Valdez; Ramal Moonesinghe; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.