Literature DB >> 19129134

The optimal coyness game.

John M McNamara1, Lutz Fromhage, Zoltan Barta, Alasdair I Houston.   

Abstract

In many animal species, females will benefit if they can secure their mate's help in raising their young. It has been suggested that they can achieve this by being coy (i.e. reluctant to mate) when courted, because this gives them time to assess a prospective mate's helpfulness and hence allows them to reject non-helpful males. According to this view, coyness should (i) reflect a trade-off between information gain and time lost on the part of the female, and (ii) be subject to an evolutionary feedback between optimal female coyness and male helping behaviour. Previous theory has considered each of these aspects in isolation. By contrast, here we present a comprehensive game theory model of this situation, leading to qualitatively new insights. We predict that a high degree of coyness should be associated with a high encounter rate during mate search, with an intermediate rate of information gain during mate inspection and with an intermediate dependence of reproduction on male help. Strongly biased sex ratios, however, preclude coyness. Due to the mutual feedback between coyness and helpfulness in our model, alternatively stable evolutionary outcomes (with or without coyness) are possible under broad conditions. We also discuss alternative interpretations of coyness.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19129134      PMCID: PMC2664358          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  Multiple patterns of parental care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  What pair formation can do to the battle of the sexes: towards more realistic game dynamics.

Authors:  S D Mylius
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  A dynamic game-theoretic model of parental care.

Authors:  J M Mcnamara; T Székely; J N Webb; A I Houston
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  The use of multiple cues in mate choice.

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2003-11

5.  Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit.

Authors:  Herman L Mays; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Conflict between parents over care.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; Tamás Székely; John M McNamara
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Stability and value of male care for offspring: is it worth only half the trouble?

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: effects of female mate choice and male care bias.

Authors:  Motohide Seki; Joe Yuichiro Wakano; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1997-05

Review 10.  Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.411

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Towards a richer evolutionary game theory.

Authors:  John M McNamara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.118

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.