| Literature DB >> 19128464 |
Daniela C U Cavallini1, Raquel Bedani, Laura Q Bomdespacho, Regina C Vendramini, Elizeu A Rossi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Much attention has been drawn to different alternative strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19128464 PMCID: PMC2628912 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-8-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Effects of E. faecium, isoflavones and simvastatin on food intake, weight gain and organ weight in the rabbits.
| 125.00 ± 0.00a | 903.05 ± 124.86a | 7.23 ± 0.61a | 83.17 ± 3.92c | 5.78 ± 0.20b | 6.59 ± 0.52b | |
| 124.93 ± 0.50a | 713.40 ± 39.75b | 5.71 ± 0.31b | 165.90 ± 3.41a | 7.06 ± 0.56a | 10.02 ± 0.72a | |
| 118.17 ± 9.92b | 810.57 ± 95.22ab | 6.85 ± 0.28a | 110.12 ± 7.53b | 6.24 ± 0.39ab | 7.21 ± 0.46b | |
| 110.14 ± 17.52c | 851.88 ± 67.04ab | 7.76 ± 0.58a | 98.22 ± 6.07bc | 5.73 ± 0.22b | 7.36 ± 0.74b | |
| 114.94 ± 13.11bc | 796.48 ± 79.76ab | 6.93 ± 0.44a | 114.73 ± 10.43b | 6.17 ± 0.47ab | 7.59 ± 0.26b |
Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Statistical comparison of groups: means with identical letters in the same column do not differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
*G = Groups: C = control; H = hypercholesterolemic; HE = hypercholesterolemic plus E. faecium; HI = hypercholesterolemic plus isoflavone; HS = hypercholesterolemic plus simvastatin.
** Coefficient of Alimentary Efficacy.
Serum lipids among the groups.
| TC | T0 | 49.0 ± 3.7a | 42.0 ± 2.8a | 46.3 ± 2.7a | 46.0 ± 1.9a | 49.0 ± 5.6a |
| T30 | 63.3 ± 4.3d | 3650.0 ± 138.0a | 3413.5 ± 192.7a | 2938.5 ± 154.5b | 2409.3 ± 154.1c | |
| T60 | 53.3 ± 6.2c | 2556.5 ± 120.3a | 2605.0 ± 166.2a | 2327.0 ± 130.9ab | 2146.0 ± 172.7b | |
| HDL-C | T0 | 31.5 ± 2.3a | 28.5 ± 2.5 a | 30.3 ± .5 a | 29.8 ± 1.9a | 32.5 ± 4.8a |
| T30 | 38.3 ± 2.1a | 25.5 ± 0.9c | 34.3 ± 2.7ab | 30.8 ± 1.8bc | 40.0 ± 3.1a | |
| T60 | 26.8 ± 2.8b | 16.8 ± 2.8d | 24.0 ± 1.9bc | 20.5 ± 2.1cd | 33.3 ± 3.3a | |
| n-HDL-C | T0 | 17.5 ± 2.6a | 13.5 ± 2.9a | 16.0 ± 2.0a | 16.3 ± 1.92a | 16.5 ± 1.1a |
| T30 | 25.0 ± 2.6d | 3624.5 ± 138.0a | 3379.3 ± 193.1a | 2907.8 ± 154.5b | 2369.3 ± 156.8c | |
| T60 | 26.5 ± 4.4c | 2539.8 ± 120.2a | 2581.5 ± 166.2a | 2307.0 ± 71.3ab | 2112.8 ± 183.1b | |
| Triglycerides | T0 | 90.0 ± 5.3a | 66.0 ± 7.3b | 99.5 ± 9.5a | 99.3 ± 9.2a | 94.0 ± 4.2a |
| T30 | 57.5 ± 2.9d | 260.3 ± 9.4a | 122.8 ± 20.4c | 203.3 ± 3.6b | 110.0 ± 4.7c | |
| T60 | 53.0 ± 4.5c | 245.5 ± 25.9a | 115.8 ± 6.4b | 215.0 ± 7.1a | 104.0 ± 17.2b |
Values (in mg/dL) represent mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical comparison of groups: means with identical minuscules letters in the same line do not differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05). C = control; H = hypercholesterolemic; HE = hypercholesterolemic plus E. faecium; HI = hypercholesterolemic plus isoflavone; HS = hypercholesterolemic plus simvastatin.
Figure 1Percent of aortic area – A = arch segment; B = thoracic segment – covered by lesion. The bar graphs represent the average (n = 6) for each group with standard errors. H = hypercholesterolemic; HE = hypercholesterolemic plus E. faecium; HI = hypercholesterolemic plus isoflavone; HS = hypercholesterolemic plus simvastatin.
Correlations of serum lipids and atherosclerotic lesions
| Total Cholesterol | -0.08 | 0.99 |
| HDL-C | -0.49 | -0.52 |
| nHDL-C | 0.24 | 0.92 |
| Triglycerides | 0.32 | 0.19 |