| Literature DB >> 19127525 |
Hiroshi Kashiwazaki1, Kazuhiro Uenishi, Toshio Kobayashi, Jose Orias Rivera, William A Coward, Antony Wright.
Abstract
By the repeated use of the doubly labeled water method (DLW), this study aimed to investigate (1) the extent of changes in energy expenditure and physical activity level (PAL) in response to increased agricultural work demands, and (2) whether the seasonal work demands induce the changes in the fairly equitable division of work and similarity of energy needs between men and women observed in our previous study (Phase 1 study; Kashiwazaki et al., 1995: Am J Clin Nutr 62: 901-910). In a rural small agropastoral community of the Bolivian Andes, we made the follow-up study (Phase 2, 14 adults; a time of high agricultural activity) of the Phase 1 study (12 adults; a time of low agricultural activity). In the Phase 2 study, both men and women showed very high PAL (mean+/-SD), but there was no significant difference by sex (men; 2.18 +/- 0.23 (age; 64 +/- 11 years, n = 7), women; 2.26 +/- 0.25 (63 +/- 10 years, n = 7)). The increase of PAL by 11% (P = 0.023) in the Phase 2 was equally occurred in both men and women. The factorial approach underestimated PAL significantly by approximately 15% (P < 0.05). High PAL throughout the year ranging on average 2.0 and 2.2 was attributable to everyday tasks for subsistence and domestic works undertaking over 9-11 h (men spent 2.7 h on agricultural work and 4.7 h on animal herding, whereas women spent 7.3 h almost exclusively on animal herding). The seasonal increase in PAL was statistically significant, but it was smaller than those anticipated from published reports. A flexible division of labor played an important role in the equitable energetic increase in both men and women. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19127525 PMCID: PMC2842569 DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Biol ISSN: 1042-0533 Impact factor: 1.937
Individual data for doubly labeled water variables, energy expenditure, and post absorptive resting metabolic ratea
| Subject | Age (year) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | Fat | Ko (24 h−1) | Kd (24 h−1) | No (mole) | Nd (mole) | TEE (kJ/24 h−1) | Estimated error (%) | BMR (kJ/24 h−1) | PAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | ||||||||||||
| M1 | 17 | 160.9 | 51.1 | 14.3 | 0.1379 | 0.1021 | 1792.1 | 1852.8 | 13058 | 16.1 | 6376 | 2.05 |
| M2 | 34 | 167.4 | 56.0 | 13.9 | 0.1558 | 0.1210 | 1964.7 | 2049.2 | 13736 | 7.1 | 6707 | 2.05 |
| M3 | 52 | 161.7 | 53.5 | 18.8 | 0.1353 | 0.1055 | 1770.7 | 1836.4 | 10544 | 5.9 | 5448 | 1.94 |
| M4 | 53 | 165.1 | 68.5 | 27.5 | 0.1431 | 0.1061 | 2026.6 | 2111.6 | 15351 | 4.5 | 6657 | 2.31 |
| M5 | 55 | 160.3 | 52.0 | 9.8 | 0.1524 | 0.1164 | 1927.8 | 1979.0 | 13966 | 5.8 | 6443 | 2.17 |
| M6 | 64 | 156.3 | 58.7 | 17.7 | 0.1346 | 0.1009 | 1972.4 | 2051.2 | 13556 | 5.0 | 5674 | 2.39 |
| M7 | 72 | 158.4 | 46.6 | 13.9 | 0.1339 | 0.1026 | 1634.8 | 1703.9 | 10305 | 5.8 | 5259 | 1.96 |
| M8 | 75 | 164.0 | 57.3 | 21.1 | 0.1015 | 0.0736 | 1847.4 | 1916.7 | 10611 | 3.8 | 5372 | 1.98 |
| M9 | 80 | 157.1 | 53.5 | 20.1 | 0.1512 | 0.1127 | 1718.5 | 1805.8 | 13569 | 5.2 | 5402 | 2.51 |
| Female | ||||||||||||
| F1 | 6 | 114.7 | 18.9 | 17.7 | 0.1923 | 0.1521 | 641.4 | 655.5 | 5114 | 7.3 | 3916 | 1.31 |
| F2 | 14 | 152.1 | 46.3 | 33.8 | 0.1767 | 0.1310 | 1242.3 | 1308.6 | 11678 | 4.7 | 5435 | 2.15 |
| F3 | 16 | 155.8 | 41.8 | 18.8 | 0.1481 | 0.1109 | 1367.6 | 1462.0 | 10519 | 6.1 | 5720 | 1.84 |
| F4 | 25 | 160.4 | 79.1 | 43.0 | 0.1265 | 0.0980 | 1835.4 | 1920.3 | 10539 | 5.2 | 7037 | 1.50 |
| F5 | 52 | 156.9 | 44.3 | 25.2 | 0.1355 | 0.1004 | 1358.9 | 1401.5 | 9711 | 4.3 | 4678 | 2.08 |
| F6 | 52 | 159.0 | 52.5 | 27.2 | 0.1782 | 0.1358 | 1550.7 | 1632.7 | 13397 | 6.1 | 5092 | 2.63 |
| F7 | 58 | 147.3 | 54.4 | 36.9 | 0.1571 | 0.1171 | 1402.2 | 1455.0 | 11431 | 4.2 | 4879 | 2.34 |
| F8 | 65 | 155.3 | 44.1 | 26.2 | 0.1489 | 0.1108 | 1333.4 | 1378.2 | 10347 | 4.5 | 4305 | 2.40 |
| F9 | 67 | 145.8 | 40.2 | 26.9 | 0.1408 | 0.1001 | 1200.5 | 1248.5 | 10134 | 4.8 | 4293 | 2.36 |
| F10 | 71 | 161.1 | 45.8 | 18.2 | 0.1389 | 0.1060 | 1524.1 | 1594.7 | 10163 | 5.5 | 5330 | 1.91 |
| F11 | 79 | 147.6 | 39.3 | 24.4 | 0.1615 | 0.1196 | 1210.5 | 1261.0 | 10372 | 4.8 | 4996 | 2.08 |
aKo and Kd, elimination rates of 18O and 2H, respectively; No and Nd, time-0 dilution spaces of 18O and 2H, respectively; FFM, fat-free mass; TEE, total energy expenditure; BMR, overnight fasting resting metabolic rate; PAL, Physical activity level = TEE/BMR. FFM calculated from 2H and 18O dilution spaces, derived by back-extrapolation of the isotope disappearance curves to zero time, ie, total body water = (Nd/1.04+ No/1.01)/2 and was divided by 0.732.
(weight–FFM) × 100/weight.
F4 and M2 were husband and wife not engaging in the agropastoral activities, without the domestic animals. M2 was working as a teacher at the elementary school of this area. The major physical activity of F4 was household chores. Their physical activity pattern differed from most of the other adults in this rural estancia. Eight months before, F4 was hospitalized fora surgical operation and treatment of injury suffered from an unfortunate accident of stone hitting on the head.
Subjects participated in the previous study.
After a few days of giving DLW, F1 had repeated attacks of diarrhea and was inactive during the DLW period. This was reflected in the relatively high water turnover rate as seen in Kd and Ko.
Fig. 1Physical activity levels (PAL) of adult subjects in Phase 1 (1990) and Phase 2 (1997). PAL: Total energy expenditure (TEE)/Basal metabolic rate (BMR). For details on subjects F12 (Phase 1), M2 (Phase 2), and F4 (Phase 2), see text.
Physical characteristics of the adult subjects in 1990 and 1997
| Phase 1 (1990) | Phase 2 (1997) | Significance of effect | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | ||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Sex | Phase | Sex* Phase | |
| Age (year) | 41.5 | 14.8 | 38.2 | 18.7 | 64.4 | 11.4 | 63.4 | 10.0 | ns | ns | |
| Height (cm) | 161.9 | 5.7 | 153.9 | 5.3 | 160.4 | 3.4 | 153.3 | 6.3 | ns | ns | |
| Weight (kg) | 54.8 | 2.8 | 48.6 | 5.4 | 55.7 | 6.9 | 45.8 | 5.7 | ns | ns | |
| BMI | 21.0 | 1.6 | 20.5 | 1.9 | 21.6 | 2.3 | 19.5 | 2.7 | ns | ns | ns |
| FFM (kg) | 46.3 | 2.4 | 35.4 | 3.6 | 45.2 | 3.4 | 33.5 | 3.4 | ns | ns | |
| Fat (%) | 15.5 | 2.1 | 27.0 | 5.3 | 18.4 | 5.6 | 26.4 | 5.5 | ns | ns | |
| BMR (kJ/24 h) | 5669 | 501 | 4795 | 340 | 5751 | 563 | 4796 | 393 | ns | ns | |
| BMR | 5067 | 200 | 5246 | 177 | 5254 | 175 | 5423 | 197 | ns | ns | ns |
BMI, body mass index expressed as weight/(height (m))2; FFM, fat free mass derived from dilution spaces of 18O and 2H. (for details, see Text and Table 1); Fat (%) = (Weight–FFM) × 100 / Weight.
Statistical significance of the factor effects tested by GLM procedure.
BMR adjusted for FFM as covariate and the data are adjusted mean ± SE.
ns, not significant; P, statistically significant with the probability of error.
Comparison of energy expenditure and physical activity indicators of adult subjects by sex and year
| Phase 1 (1990) | Phase 2 (1997) | Significance of effect | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEE or Physical activity indicators | Male | Female | Male | Female | Sex | Phase | Sex* Phase | ||||
| Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | ||||
| Adjusted Mean of TEE or AEE | |||||||||||
| TEE (MJ/24 h) | 10.46 | 0.54 | 10.22 | 0.53 | 11.75 | 0.52 | 11.76 | 0.54 | ns | P = 0.01 | ns |
| AEE (MJ/24 h) | 4.97 | 0.50 | 5.30 | 0.49 | 6.22 | 0.48 | 6.70 | 0.50 | ns | P = 0.009 | ns |
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Relative term (BMR or body weight) | |||||||||||
| PAL (TEE/BMR) | 1.96 | 0.25 | 2.04 | 0.17 | 2.18 | 0.23 | 2.26 | 0.25 | ns | P = 0.023 | ns |
| TEE/kg weight (kJ/24 h) | 202 | 27 | 202 | 16 | 226 | 29 | 237 | 21 | ns | P = 0.005 | ns |
| AEE/kg weight (kJ/24 h) | 99 | 26 | 102 | 14 | 122 | 24 | 131 | 19 | ns | P = 0.005 | ns |
TEE, Total energy expenditure determined by Doubly labeled water method; AEE, Activity related energy expenditure derived as TEE-BMR.
Statistical significance of the differences tested by GLM procedure;
Mean and standard error (SE) adjusted for body weight as covariate. Adjusted mean was estimated with 51.2 kg body weight.
No covariate was applied.
ns, not significant; P, statistically significant with the probability of error
Time spent (min/24 h) and estimated energy cost (PAR × h) for activities (Data from Phase 2)
| Time spent (min) | Time Weighted Energy Cost (ECtw) = Sum of PAR × time (hr) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activities Classified | Male | Female | Male | Female | |||||||||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Sex difference | Energy Cost (PARc) | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Sex difference | |
| Five major categories | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-categories of the major categories | |||||||||||||||||||
| I: Subsistence | 437.4 | 70 | 444.4 | 92 | ns | 25.7 | 4.9 | 23.8 | 4.8 | ns | |||||||||
| IA Daily herding and Animal Care | 277 | 71 | 437 | 102 | a | 3.2 | 14.8 | 3.8 | 23.3 | 5.5 | a | ||||||||
| IB Farming work | 160 | 100 | 8 | 18 | ad | 4.1 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 0.5 | 1.3 | ba | ||||||||
| II: Household chores | 87 | 58 | 213.3 | 101 | a | 3.2 | 2.1 | 7.7 | 3.7 | b | |||||||||
| IIA food processing, and Cooking meals | 43 | 34 | 146 | 59 | a | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 2.1 | a | ||||||||
| IIB Sweeping, washing, repairing | 44 | 27 | 68 | 51 | ns | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 | ns | ||||||||
| III: Eating and discretionary activities | 194.4 | 39 | 129.2 | 41 | a | 4.7 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 1.0 | b | |||||||||
| IIIA Easting meals, taking tea | 80 | 22 | 75 | 13 | ns | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 0.3 | ns | ||||||||
| IIIB Rest, chatting, reading | 115 | 27 | 54 | 35 | a | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.8 | a | ||||||||
| IV: Social Relation (Community meeting) | 59 | 47 | 0 | 0 | bd | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ba | ||||||||
| V: Overnight Sleep | 662 | 74 | 653 | 85 | ns | 1.0 | 11.0 | 1.2 | 10.9 | 1.4 | ns | ||||||||
| Total | 1440 | 1440 | 46.0 | 2.9 | 45.5 | 2.3 | ns | ||||||||||||
a, b: by t-test for the differences, a; P < 0.01, b < 0.05; ns; not significant.
cPAR, Physical activity ratio (energy expenditure of the activity/BMR), adopted from Tables 5-1 FAO 2004.
d Denotes t-test by separate-variance estimate, after the F value used to test homogeneity of variance and its probability.